Skip to content

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
BPCON2026 Orlando

October 2 - 4 Early Bird tickets are now ON SALE. Purchase your tickets today and save $100!

Get tickets
BPCON2026 Orlando

October 2 - 4 Early Bird tickets are now ON SALE. Purchase your tickets today and save $100!

Get tickets
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Multi-Family and Apartment Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

45
Posts
23
Votes
Andrew Schena
  • Developer
  • Boston, MA
23
Votes |
45
Posts

Property Management Fees on A/B Class Assets

Andrew Schena
  • Developer
  • Boston, MA
Posted

I'm currently looking at a 105 unit deal, which is comprised of 2 different assets.  One of the assets is Class A, and built 5 years ago.  The other property is a 70's product that just got repositioned to a Class B product 2 years ago.  The current owner is operating the properties without an actual "Management Fee", and simply pays a higher R&M expense, and simply pays the salaries of the employees in the Payroll Expense, across both properties.  The Payroll expense equals 6%, which is exactly what the Management Fee would be for this asset.  R&M expense is higher than average for these assets because of this as well, but it does save on paying the combination of Payroll + Management Fee + R&M.  

So, here are my questions:  Does anyone out there own any Class A/B that has seen this set up?  It would allow me to pay a higher price for the assets, and be more competitive, but am I being penny wise and pound foolish?  These would be 7-10 year holds, so in that time frame, as the assets age, am I going to start being better off running the assets traditionally as the R&M expenses begin to increase over time?  

I appreciate any feedback!  Thanks everyone.

  • Andrew Schena
  • Loading replies...