Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Multi-Family and Apartment Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

5
Posts
0
Votes
Ernesto Carozza
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Tampa, FL
0
Votes |
5
Posts

What is the cap rate target for a duplex rental ?

Ernesto Carozza
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Tampa, FL
Posted

To current and previous multi family real estate investors, what was your target cap rate when evaluating a possible investment property? I am aiming between 8-10% but would love some feedback !

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

21
Posts
14
Votes
Dan Biber
  • Developer
  • Atlanta, GA
14
Votes |
21
Posts
Dan Biber
  • Developer
  • Atlanta, GA
Replied

For a larger multi-family deal, I forecast the exit (reversion cap rates) only. Since we typically acquire value-add multi-family assets, going-in cap rates don't mean anything. The better financial return metrics would be cash-on-cash, IRR, equity multiple. What the financial return metrics to focus on is really based on what your goals are. Short term hold, long term hold, only your equity, other investors in the deal, etc.

For smaller multi-family deals, I mainly focus on cash-on-cash returns.  Anything over 15% cash-on-cash, I'm satisfied with.

Thanks,

Dan Biber

Loading replies...