I know this will vary greatly by market, but in general, what are people targeting for cashflow per door on mid-sized apartment buildings?
Return per door is irrelevant. It's all about return on investment over time and velocity of cashflow. Cash on cash and IRR are the metrics you need to focus on not doors.
Of course - it depends (on income, expenses and debt service size based on what % you put down and rate, and importantly, on whether the goal of the property is cash flow (C&D markets) versus Property appreciation (A&B markets). For example, buying apartments in San Francisco may NOT have any cash flow per door, but over 5 years the goal is return on the value of the property based on appreciation.
That said - when I run my deal screening calculations, I look for cash flow per door of no less than $150, ideally $200+.
I know this will vary greatly by market, but in general, what are people targeting for cashflow per door on mid-sized apartment buildings?
Return per door is irrelevant. It's all about return on investment over time and velocity of cashflow. Cash on cash and IRR are the metrics you need to focus on not doors.
I would agree overall with @Greg Dickerson. COC and IRR are the most common metrics passive investors will be looking at. Another angle to this is, what do your investors want?? I know some investors that are totally fine with 8% COC throughout a 5-7 yr hold. I know some that want an average of 10% COC and preferably, a return of capital from a refinance. There are some investors that just park money into barely cash-flowing assets for appreciation (although I truly do not believe this is as common or attractive). But I think overall, ask what kind of COC and IRR your investors prefer? And then, do you cashflow yourself on the GP side of the deal if they hit those metrics? That's what I'd be thinking about.
That isn't really fair to say it's irrelevant. It's just another way (among the dozens of metrics) to analyze a deal or your actual property. I have a 24 unit property, and track CoC ann. trend and $ per door ann. trend monthly.
Cash on Cash formula is Cash flow/down-paymnt + fees.
Per door is Cash flow/number of doors.
In both cases the numerator is the same, changing the denominator just gives you a different way to look at it. (and a simpler way to understand it for many.)
eg. my 24 unit makes CF of $60 annually. Thats ~200$ pd/pm. If that was a 30 unit, it would be ~165$ pd/pm. If I paid the same $ for both sample properties, you are right, the lower cash flow per door for the 20 unit makes it look less attractive - but the CoC and IRR would be exactly the same (based on the $60k). So I see that point. But f we play that out, and make it a 100 unit with that same $60k CF, the pd/pm is just $45 - even though your CoC and IRR is the same. I'd rather ONLY manage and R&M 24 tenants than 100 any day. So there is SOME value in using $ per door as ONE of many metrics to look at...
I know this will vary greatly by market, but in general, what are people targeting for cashflow per door on mid-sized apartment buildings?
Return per door is irrelevant. It's all about return on investment over time and velocity of cashflow. Cash on cash and IRR are the metrics you need to focus on not doors.
I guess I'm looking at apartments not so much from the syndication model as a single owner, potentially 2-partner purchase. Does that make the return per door more relevant or not?
That isn't really fair to say it's irrelevant. It's just another way (among the dozens of metrics) to analyze a deal or your actual property. I have a 24 unit property, and track CoC ann. trend and $ per door ann. trend monthly.
Cash on Cash formula is Cash flow/down-paymnt + fees.
Per door is Cash flow/number of doors.
In both cases the numerator is the same, changing the denominator just gives you a different way to look at it. (and a simpler way to understand it for many.)
eg. my 24 unit makes CF of $60 annually. Thats ~200$ pd/pm. If that was a 30 unit, it would be ~165$ pd/pm. If I paid the same $ for both sample properties, you are right, the lower cash flow per door for the 20 unit makes it look less attractive - but the CoC and IRR would be exactly the same (based on the $60k). So I see that point. But f we play that out, and make it a 100 unit with that same $60k CF, the pd/pm is just $45 - even though your CoC and IRR is the same. I'd rather ONLY manage and R&M 24 tenants than 100 any day. So there is SOME value in using $ per door as ONE of many metrics to look at...
Thanks David, really good insight here. Never considered this perspective of the cash flow per door changing while the CoC and IRR could remain the same. Your 24-unit, do you own that individually or did you raise funds for it?
Some other really good points were made. Cashflow per door is one metric to look at. If you want it to be a criteria for acquisitions, you can. Same with any other metric, they are all subjective in the course of action an investor takes. That being said, targeting $150-$200/door is realistic for a C+/potentially B- asset. Assuming some conservative underwriting.
@Matt Jennissen I agree with @Greg Dickerson you should just review your underwriting to determine overall return on investment and other property level return metrics. If you feel inclined you can always divide by number of units to get a per door stat.
Agreed with everyone above, its probably not the most efficient way to think about it, but it is a fun one to see incrementally creep up :)
I think at that size and b/c ish condition in a solid but not "premier" market, with some turnover rehabs the numbers people are talking about usually work out above $200/dr
Thanks everyone! I see that apartments are quite a bit different than single family and duplexes/triplexes that I'm used to when considering the financials behind them. Still have a lot to learn in this space.
I think it's fine to use $/door for some rough calculations for your goals (how many doors you will need to achieve X passive income over time) to help give you some direction or sense of magnitude required. However, when evaluating individual properties agreed that IRR, AAR, and COC are key.