Skip to content

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
BPCON2026 Orlando

October 2 - 4 Early Bird tickets are now ON SALE. Purchase your tickets today and save $100!

Get tickets
BPCON2026 Orlando

October 2 - 4 Early Bird tickets are now ON SALE. Purchase your tickets today and save $100!

Get tickets
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Multi-Family and Apartment Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

7
Posts
3
Votes
Danielle Bennett
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
3
Votes |
7
Posts

Underwriting rents with HCV

Danielle Bennett
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
Posted

I am looking for recommendations on underwriting a deal.

100-units with 60% occupied by tenants with LA County housing choice vouchers (HCV) - many of which rents are below current HCV payment standards, 10% vacant, 25% occupied below market.

LACDA publishes HCV payment standards annually. 2021 PS are approximately 15% below market. LACDA PS was flat for 2010-2012, and again 2018-2020. The PS increased in 2021 by 5.45%. LACDA will also increase contract rent to the lesser of current PS or amount capped by CA rent control (5%+CPI).

Back to my underwriting question:

I am assuming rents for vacant units at leased at market, occupied non-HCV units at increased up to market (over 1-2 years), HCV units increased to max allowable (current PS or rent control increase). This may be conservative since it does not assume any turnover of HCV units (which do not turn regularly).

Am I missing something here?

Loading replies...