Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Land & New Construction
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

7
Posts
4
Votes
Corey Stevens
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Washington Court House, OH
4
Votes |
7
Posts

Is this house hack worth it?

Corey Stevens
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Washington Court House, OH
Posted

Would doing a house hack where only 2/3 of the monthly mortgage payment is covered be worth it? Mortgage payment being $1500 and it rents for $1000.

I always hear of people getting their mortgage fully covered and living for free, but is it still worth it to still pay $500/month out of pocket to still get the appreciation, equity, tax benefits, and possibility to use it as a long term 2 unit rental?

Just want to make sure I’m not missing something! Thinking of doing new construction of a duplex in a nice area versus a house hack in a more “sketchy” area to say the least. I understand cash flow can be higher rehabbing an existing place. The problem I’m running into is duplexes for sale in my town are in worse locations. Unfortunately, those look like my only 2 options at this point.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

183
Posts
159
Votes
Trent Stone
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Salt Lake City, UT
159
Votes |
183
Posts
Trent Stone
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Salt Lake City, UT
Replied

Grant Cardon's rule is "When the crane is in the air, beware". You have to take into account the amount of new inventory being built and how it is going to impact the demand for your product. I little town in Utah is scheduled for 35,000 new dwellings over a 5 year period. You couldn't pay me enough to invest there. It might look like a decent investment now, but those developers are going to get caught with their pants down in the near future and I want to be far away from it. Also, as it stands, those units are renting for below a 5 cap. So sure, if you are sitting on massive amounts of wealth and you are just looking for long-term appreciation, then go for it. Otherwise I think you would be FAR better off buying something in an established neighborhood with a relative fixed supply. That also keeps you from speculated what the market will do with the changes in supply v. demand, you will have a ton of historical data to support your investment. Much safer IMO.

Loading replies...