Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 3 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

198
Posts
180
Votes
David S.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Larkspur, CO
180
Votes |
198
Posts

When and how did you move into syndications over SFH's?

David S.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Larkspur, CO
Posted

Hey folks, curious what you'd recommend in my shoes... I have two rentals at the moment, both SFH's. These were bought with savings rather than financed. I have the option of lending against my primary which would free up $400-500k, but I'm wondering if it doesn't make sense to get involved with syndicates here and now, rather than do years of single family homes first, only to gravitate toward multi-family eventually anyway? I have a background in finance and have held a number of licenses, so I do believe I'd be deemed an accredited investor by default, which helps. Certainly have an interest in syndication, but I see how competitive that space is, and I have systems in place for more single family homes.

What factors would you consider? With what I just said, what would you do? What is the best route into syndicates (other than the obvious networking). Thanks

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

312
Posts
282
Votes
Zachary Inman
  • Specialist
  • Indianapolis, IN
282
Votes |
312
Posts
Zachary Inman
  • Specialist
  • Indianapolis, IN
Replied

Hi David,

Full disclosure, I work with a top Midwest Multifamily Syndicator, so keep that in mind when reading :)

It truly depends on your investing and life goals. With active SFH investments, you will continue to spend a significant amount of time, effort, and money on your deals. When you scale up, the amount of time, money, and effort will only increase proportionally to the number of deals you have. Of course, there is the potential for higher returns investing actively.

With passive investing through syndications, the biggest advantage is being able to leverage an operator's track record, experience, and connections and invest passively - which buys you back your time while often receiving similar or higher risk-adjusted returns. The primary risk with syndications is operator risk. Being a limited partner is the biggest advantage and the biggest disadvantage. It's an advantage because you can invest in high-quality, low-risk deals passively, and a disadvantage because if you invest with a poor operator then the LP has limited recourse. 

When finding reputable sponsors, google is a good place to start. Established, lower-risk sponsors will have an online presence. Also, there are several threads on BP and other forums with LPs discussing reputable sponsors. When evaluating, be sure to ask for an audited track record of full cycle deals.

Loading replies...