Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 2 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

14
Posts
4
Votes
Jamie C.
  • Arvada, CO
4
Votes |
14
Posts

Mom in a pickle with charity's property

Jamie C.
  • Arvada, CO
Posted

(posting this for a friend who’s not on BP)
Situation:
My mom and dad have big hearts and made a nice gesture but unsound “personal finances” decision years ago. My mom runs a charity and to ensure the loan would be approved for a new property for the charity, they co-signed a mortgage. They also used my dad’s life insurance as collateral. My dad passed, life insurance payout was applied to the mortgage, my mom paid off the remaining mortgage balance. All of my parents’ financial contributions were under the premise that it was a loan to the charity. My mom’s trying to retire and extract the money owed her by the charity (which the charity’s board desperately wants to make her whole). It’s all very amicable between her and the charity. The plan is to sell the property, and the equity proceeds will pay her back in full and have enough left over for a down payment on a new property for the charity.

Issue: They put the property up for sale, on the market for 5 months, received fours offers…all from other charitable organizations… but the city rejected the offers. The city is hyper vigilant about recent increases in the homeless population. The offers weren’t from homeless shelter organizations per se, but they were affiliated with low-income type of residents, rehab, assisted care, etc. and the city doesn’t think those organizations fit in the neighborhood. They have history with my mom’s charity and know they don’t cause problems but they’re worried about similar new charities. My mom’s lawyer (though he’s not super versed in real estate law) evaluated and said, not much chance of forcing the city to allow acceptance of one of the offers.

Zoned as:
Address type: Residential
Address subtype: Group quarters
Zoning description: Residential neighborhood
Property has 10 bedrooms, 13 baths, 1 big-ish kitchen

No offers came in from an individual family looking to reside, nor from non-charitable businesses. No immediate need to make my mom’s finances whole, but I am the executor of her estate either now or when she passes, I don’t know how to resolve this.

Me: Not sure how to advise my friend, could really use the help of the forum. Leaving the names of his mom, city, and charity out, just in case anyone from the city reads this and also to keep his mom’s personal business anonymous.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

3,198
Posts
2,714
Votes
Matt Devincenzo
  • Investor
  • Clairemont, CA
2,714
Votes |
3,198
Posts
Matt Devincenzo
  • Investor
  • Clairemont, CA
Replied

Ultimately it sounds like this is a capitalization issue more than a sale issue...they're seeking recapitalization via a sale, but could also do this via a loan/cash out etc. It seems like what should have happened is when Dad died and Mom paid off the loan, the charity should have executed a DOT mortgage for that same amount. The charity being unable to obtain a loan years ago should have changed now that they 1) have several years of operating 'income' to show 2) the asset's value should arguable have increased to where the LTV could be much lower and 3) they have a record of on time payments. So with a new loan in place they could pursue a rate an term refi to clear their debt to Mom.

Another thought would be can the existing charity 'partner' with one of the purchasing entities such that there is no longer a req't for the City to approve the sale? I assume the approval is not actually for the sale per se, but for a CUP or other permit that is necessary to operate. So if the record owner remains in title could the existing permit remain in effect with the new day to day operator? Or if there is still a need for City approval, could doing it this way mitigate the City's concerns since the current charity is staying around to make sure the new charity 'behaves'? Then once a few years pass you could seek a stand alone approval for the new charity. 

Loading replies...