Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated 9 months ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

1
Posts
0
Votes
Bryan Woo
0
Votes |
1
Posts

This is my very first post. Hope I can get some insight about California AB 468

Bryan Woo
Posted

My question is, why isn't there a legal challenge against this law? It's unconstitutional. It's forcing landlord to pay for other people's medical conditions.

We all know about Biden administration's eviction moratorium, which was defeated in court. It robbed landlord to aid another group people. On same token, AB 468 should be defeated. Denying application because of pet is not about discrimination (man they abused this word so much), it's about who pays for the cleanup cost. If tenant won't pay, will government pay landlords?

And California also capped security deposit, thus literally robbing landlords by AB 468 that's faking human right issue.

If there is class lawsuit, I want to be the first to jump on.

But my question is, why landlords are so docile to this evil law? 

I have rental property in California but I'm not California resident. That's why I really don't know what Californians are thinking.  Any feedback would be appreciated. Thank you

Loading replies...