I wouldn't offer subject to out of the gate. It's really something for motivated sellers, usually with highly leveraged properties and good interest terms. You don't want someone else responsible for paying your mortgage. If they stop paying, your credit is hurt. Furthermore, by having an outstanding loan with no income, it makes it more difficult to get another loan in the future.
Any I don't think it will help that much in selling the property (unless the interest rate is really good). Only real estate investors would even be interested in that.
I wouldn't offer subject to out of the gate. It's really something for motivated sellers, usually with highly leveraged properties and good interest terms. You don't want someone else responsible for paying your mortgage. If they stop paying, your credit is hurt. Furthermore, by having an outstanding loan with no income, it makes it more difficult to get another loan in the future.
Any I don't think it will help that much in selling the property (unless the interest rate is really good). Only real estate investors would even be interested in that.
I wouldn't offer subject to out of the gate. It's really something for motivated sellers, usually with highly leveraged properties and good interest terms. You don't want someone else responsible for paying your mortgage. If they stop paying, your credit is hurt. Furthermore, by having an outstanding loan with no income, it makes it more difficult to get another loan in the future.
Any I don't think it will help that much in selling the property (unless the interest rate is really good). Only real estate investors would even be interested in that.
Nothing riskier for a seller than to sell sub to. full stop.. for the reasons Mr. Syrios points out. U transfer title and lose control yet your still on the hook for the mortgage what could possibly go wrong.. for buyers its fine for sellers in my mind its foolish. Unless the property is such that its only way to sell it. And even at that you want to do a wrap not a straight sub to so you have the ability to foreclose when your buyer defaults which is pretty common with these deals. U then have to make your payments while your buyer is ripping your rents .. and in Baltimore foreclosures take at least a year and cost thousands.. you could find yourself upside down 25k or more before you knew what hit you.. so is it worth the risk.
Google All inclusive Deed of Trust California.. this is hands down the best debt instrument to use if you can .. read it carefully and you will understand what rights this debt instrument gives you as the beneficiary of said instrument.
I see what you mean, my thought was that an interested investor would see the value of the cheap debt.
Why don't you just rent it out then? I would definitely want to keep a mortgage like that even if the property isn't ideal. If it's too expensive to cash flow, maybe try it as a short term rental