Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 18 hours ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

3
Posts
0
Votes
Dan Steele
0
Votes |
3
Posts

STR in an expensive, close area or STR in far, less expensive areas?

Dan Steele
Posted

Hi all, I'm doing a 1031 exchange for my parents' retirement for the first time (working through IPX). I've identified a property that is close to me in Pennsylvania and it's decent price but it's not cheap and requires some renos. I'm under contract with that. With the rest of the 1031 (about $1.2M leftover), I can do one more in the area or I can do even up to 3 if I'm willing to take a plane ride and go to a different city. Mainly because the homes are cheaper. I understand there are a lot of variables at play here, but my initial logic is that I can make my money back faster with 3 than 1. If I use that $1.2M to buy one home that's close I also realize I can probably charge more since it'll be a bigger house (5bd+). But with 3 at 3bds in a decent STR market, I have to think I'll make back that money faster with 3 decent homes instead of 1 bigger home. I'd appreciate any feedback on this and how I should think through my approach because I want to make sure my parents' investment is in an appreciating area that is flexible for STR/MTR/LTR if I need to switch things up.

My experience is that I've run one STR before and am confident I can spin up remote operations with a property or area manager. 3 at once seems risky and a bit daunting, but I'm willing to do it. Oh and any suggestions on solid STR areas I should explore would be very helpful.

Thanks in advance,
Dan

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

91
Posts
125
Votes
Lauren Robins
  • Attorney
  • Salt Lake City, UT
125
Votes |
91
Posts
Lauren Robins
  • Attorney
  • Salt Lake City, UT
Replied
Quote from @Dan Steele:

Hi all, I'm doing a 1031 exchange for my parents' retirement for the first time (working through IPX). I've identified a property that is close to me in Pennsylvania and it's decent price but it's not cheap and requires some renos. I'm under contract with that. With the rest of the 1031 (about $1.2M leftover), I can do one more in the area or I can do even up to 3 if I'm willing to take a plane ride and go to a different city. Mainly because the homes are cheaper. I understand there are a lot of variables at play here, but my initial logic is that I can make my money back faster with 3 than 1. If I use that $1.2M to buy one home that's close I also realize I can probably charge more since it'll be a bigger house (5bd+). But with 3 at 3bds in a decent STR market, I have to think I'll make back that money faster with 3 decent homes instead of 1 bigger home. I'd appreciate any feedback on this and how I should think through my approach because I want to make sure my parents' investment is in an appreciating area that is flexible for STR/MTR/LTR if I need to switch things up.

My experience is that I've run one STR before and am confident I can spin up remote operations with a property or area manager. 3 at once seems risky and a bit daunting, but I'm willing to do it. Oh and any suggestions on solid STR areas I should explore would be very helpful.

Thanks in advance,
Dan

Hi Dan! 

You're thinking through the right variables as you consider how best to use the remaining $1.2M from your parents' 1031 exchange. The idea of purchasing three smaller properties versus one larger, local property has solid merit. With three properties in strong short-term rental (STR) markets, you’re likely to generate more total cash flow and benefit from income diversification. If one property underperforms or sits vacant, the others can help balance it out. You also gain more exit flexibility and possibly better ROI, particularly in affordable areas with strong tourism demand. That said, the trade-off is added complexity—managing remote properties across multiple cities, even with good local managers, introduces operational challenges and a steeper learning curve. On the other hand, purchasing one larger home close to you allows for hands-on oversight, especially helpful if the property requires renovations. A larger home might command premium bookings for groups or retreats, and if the STR market cools, it’s easier to pivot to a mid- or long-term rental strategy locally.

As for markets to consider, if you stay close to Pennsylvania, the Poconos still perform well for STRs, and Lancaster or Gettysburg offer growing tourism potential. Going further afield, areas like the Smoky Mountains in Tennessee, Panama City Beach or Destin in Florida, Flagstaff or Prescott in Arizona, and parts of Northern Georgia and Western North Carolina all offer strong STR demand, appreciating home values, and generally landlord-friendly environments. If you opt for multiple properties, just be mindful of varying local STR regulations and compliance burdens. From a 1031 standpoint, ensure that the total value of the replacement properties meets or exceeds what was sold, and that debt is properly replaced or offset with cash. Ultimately, if you're confident in your ability to manage remote teams and operations, going with three properties could offer stronger long-term returns. However, starting with the local property may provide a smoother ramp-up while giving you time to research and scale intelligently. If you're up against timing issues, combining a property purchase with a DST or Tenant-in-Common structure could also help defer taxes while maintaining flexibility.

Note: This information is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, tax, financial, or investment advice. No attorney-client, fiduciary, or professional relationship is established through this communication.

Loading replies...