Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated 18 days ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

42
Posts
12
Votes

Is it a Red Flag to Not have all Owners on Loan?

Posted

Hey all,

I have a property that I own as tenants in common with a few friends. I am the only person who lives at the property. It is classified as my primary residence. I am there basically to oversee the renovation and then I will move out.

Anyways we plan to get a second lien to find some of the renovation. My mortgage broker has told me that generally her second lien lenders do not allow non-occupant co-borrowers on the loan. Is it sketchy / any red flags to not have all owners on the loan?

Not sure if it matters but my US Bank 1st lien only has 2 of the owners (myself and 1 other) on it. This was done because the US Bank loan officer did not think it was necessary to have all 5 owners. 

Just want to make sure I am not making any big mistakes here. My attorney today told me that this is a huge red flag and is extremely uncommon, but according to my mortgage brokers and US Bank loan officer, and own personal experience, it is extremely common. My attorney could just be wrong.

Would appreciate any insight the community has. Thanks!

Loading replies...