Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated 2 months ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

12
Posts
4
Votes
Patricio Acosta
4
Votes |
12
Posts

How Can I Structure My House Flipping Deals in California?

Patricio Acosta
Posted

Hi everyone, I run a house-flipping business in California through an LLC and I'm looking for guidance on how to structure my deals so that outside investors can contribute capital and receive a share of the profits, without becoming formal equity partners or members of the LLC.

My goal is to keep the legal and tax structure simple by avoiding adding members to the LLC, while still offering investors a return tied to the performance of specific projects. Ideally, these investors would feel like equity participants in the upside but would remain legally as creditors or profit participants. I'm considering profit-participating loans or revenue-sharing agreements and possibly securing their investment with real estate or recorded liens.

I want to ensure this is done in a way that complies with California law, avoids triggering partnership tax treatment, and doesn’t lead the IRS or courts to recharacterize the arrangement as equity. Has anyone structured something like this successfully? I’d really appreciate any insight or experience with similar setups. Thanks!

Loading replies...