Real Estate Agent · Washington, D.C. · Member since 2012 · 17k+ posts · 30k+ votes
9y
You know the holder of the TM is a BP member right? So he will probably see this. Also they likely have a lot more money than you do to spend on court costs.
Real Estate Consultant · Summerlin, NV · Member since 2014 · 45k+ posts · 66k+ votes
9y
@Russell Brazil my last real estate brokerage was Real Estate Executives I used to get nasty grams from Realty Executives legal council.. just filed them in the circular file.. unless they were going to litigate which they never did .. I just kept on with the name.
You know the holder of the TM is a BP member right? So he will probably see this. Also they likely have a lot more money than you do to spend on court costs.
Yes I'm aware. This is not my fight but I support the effort. "We buy houses" should not be a protected trademark.
I asked a patent attorney friend about something similar a few years ago. He replied "You cannot protect marks that are merely descriptive. You cannot prevent others from using those same descriptive words. You need to choose a trademark\service mark that is not merely descriptive of your services."
Wholesaler And Coach · Springfield, VA · Member since 2011 · 169 posts · 75 votes
9y
what you don't get is its great to throw his demand letters in the trash - but what do you do when he gets your youtube vidoes, facebook page and linkedin taken down????? We have started a campaign to cancel the trademark. He took down 100+ of my highly ranked youtube videos.
Residential Real Estate Agent · Irvine, CA · Member since 2013 · 2k+ posts · 1k+ votes
9y
Yeah, the trademark of the saying is really silly, but once someone gets that locked in for their IP then they have the rights to do whatever they want if someone uses it and they want to pursue them. It’s such a blanket saying, so anyone could be saying it and no would ever know until it’s posted right here on BP. @Larry Flanagan
Investor / Borrower / Contractor · Pittsburgh, PA · Member since 2016 · 60 posts · 29 votes
9y
Falls under the Blue Sky - when you try to claim that you own the sky and people must pay you just to breathe, I think you are very shady. IMHO! Next, you open yourself up to a lot of litigation - I think most people would desire to avoid any litigation - anyone who would try to claim ownership to the Blue Sky, is nothing but a trouble maker, dramatists, coldhearted and greedy.
The other problem lies with those who decide to give credence to these submissions of ownership of names and phrases - the Trademark Office. They should be held to a higher standard of intelligence - the knowledge of knowing whether or not a phrase is a generally used phrase by people in a particular industry or not. Then, originality should also be considered or prior use.
As far as I can remember, people have used this phrase - back as far as the '80's. Use of this phrase is so prevalent in many markets - it should not be TradeMarked!