Opportunity Zone - For Real Estate Investors

Opportunity Zone - For Real Estate Investors

Member since 2018 · 1 post · 3 votes

The Opportunity Zones program was established by Congress in the Tax Cut and Jobs Act as an innovative approach to spurring long-term private sector investments in low-income urban and rural communities nationwide. The program is based on the bipartisan Investing in Opportunity Act.

WHAT IS AN OPPORTUNITY ZONE?

An Opportunity Zone is an economically-distressed community where new investments, under certain conditions, may be eligible for preferential tax treatment. Localities qualify as Opportunity Zones if they have been nominated for that designation by the state and that nomination has been certified by the Secretary of the U.S. Treasury.

  1. Opportunity Zones were added to the tax code by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act on December 22, 2017.
  2. Opportunity Zones are an economic development tool—that is, they are designed to spur economic development and job creation in distressed communities.
  3. Opportunity Zones are designed to spur economic development by providing tax benefits to investors. First, investors can defer tax on any prior gains until the earlier of the date on which an investment is sold or exchanged, or December 31, 2026, so long as the gain is reinvested in a Qualified Opportunity Fund. Second, if the investor holds the investment in the Opportunity Fund for at least ten years, the investor would be eligible for an increase in basis equal to the fair market value of the investment on the date that the investment is sold or exchanged.

SO, WHAT’S THE BIG HYPE?

The program establishes a mechanism that enables investors with capital gains tax liabilities across the country to receive favorable tax treatment for investing in Opportunity Funds that are certified by the U.S. Treasury Department. The Opportunity Funds use the capital invested to make equity investments in businesses and real estate in Opportunity Zones designated by each state.

Investors who plow a 2018 capital gain into an opportunity fund gets three breaks:

  1. Deferral of tax on their 2018 gain until 2016
  2. A 15% reduction on those gains when they are taxed in 2026
  3. Tax free growth of their opportunity investment, as long as they hold it for at least ten years.

INVESTOR INVESTMENT EXAMPLE:

In 2018, an individual investor sells 1,000 shares of Amazon stock that they purchased in 2013 for $250,000. The sale at $1,250 per share results in a $1 million capital gain. Instead of paying the $238,000 (assuming 20% rate and 3.8% net invest income tax) in federal capital gains tax on this sale, the investor rolls their $1 million gain into a Qualified Opportunity Fund that invests the capital in newly issued preferred stock shares of various operating businesses located in Opportunity Zones with a plan to liquidate the fund in 2028.

The assumed value of this investment in 2028 is $2 million. The benefits received by this investor include:

  • Investing $1 million instead of the $762,000 that would be remaining if the capital was not re-invested into an Opportunity Fund.
  • Paying $202,300 in taxes in 2026 instead of paying $238,000 in 2018.
  • Owing no additional tax on the $1 million in capital gains on the Opportunity Fund investment realized in 2028
  • CREATION OF OPPORTUNTITY FUNDS
    1. Must be certified by the U.S. Treasury Department.
    2. Must be organized as a corporation or partnership for the purpose of investing in Qualified Opportunity Zone Property.

    3. Must hold at least 90% of their assets in Qualified Opportunity Zone Property.

    4.Qualified Opportunity Zone property includes newly issued stock, partnership interests, or business property in a Qualified Opportunity Zone business.

    5.Opportunity Fund investments are limited to equity investments in businesses, real estate, and business assets that are located in a Qualified Opportunity Zone. Loans are not eligible for the tax incentives. Opportunity Fund investments in real estate are subject to a substantial rehabilitation requirement.

    EXAMPLES OF POTENTIAL OPPORTUNITY FUNDS

    1. A $100 million national private equity fund that provides growth capital to lower middle market operating businesses located in Opportunity Zones.
    2. A $10 million local fund that provides the equity capital for the $100 million redevelopment of a closed shopping mall into a mixed-use development that includes new neighborhood retail and workforce housing.
    3. A $20 million disaster area fund that develops and leases new affordable housing for residents displaced by the 2017 hurricanes and forest fires.

    However, there are at least three strategies that allow a qualified opportunity fund to be open to its entire community, including non-accredited investors:

    1. Real estate fund: A fund whose primary business is investing in real estate and 90% of whose assets consist of real estate in an opportunity zone will be a qualified opportunity fund and will be exempt from the burdensome regulations of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”), which paves the way for the fund to raise capital via a direct public offering – making it a true community investment fund.

    2. Small business holding company: This type of fund is exempt from the 1940 Act if most of its assets comprise controlled or majority-owned subsidiaries – the idea being that the fund is in whatever business its subsidiaries are in, rather than in the securities investment business. Again, if 90% of its holdings are businesses in opportunity zones, it will also be a qualified opportunity fund.

    3. Intrastate fund: A closed-end fund of up to $10 million, all of whose investors reside in the same state, is eligible to seek an exemptive order from the SEC that allows it to raise community capital via a direct public offering and while avoiding all or most of the 1940 Act’s regulations. Such a fund could invest in either business or real estate in opportunity zones and thereby also become a qualified opportunity fund.

    With any of these strategies, a community-scale fund can open up the opportunity for community ownership of community assets, with everyone able to participate on a level playing field, and everyone able to reap the profits from local ventures.

    Over the next few months, the Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service will be providing further details, including additional legal guidance, on this new incentive. More information will be available at Treasury.gov and IRS.gov.

    3Reply
    133 views

    Most Popular Reply

    Investor · New York, NY · Member since 2016 · 105 posts · 118 votes
    8y

    @Joseph M. as it relates to real estate investments within an Opportunity Zone, you would need to double your basis in the property within 30 months.  Unless you're buying and rehabbing a highly distressed multi-family property, the program is a better fit for ground-up development or adaptive re-use/redevelopment type of projects.    What is still clear as it relates to the timeline is when the 30-month clock would start.  For example, if I buy a piece of land and it takes me 12-months to receive entitlements, do those 12 months count against my 30 month deadline or does the clock only start once I have approvals?

    In terms of holding period, to achieve the maximum benefit you would need to hold the fund for at least 10 years.  If you only hold for 5 years then your tax bill on your original gain is reduced by 10%.  Hold for 7 years the savings go up to 15%.   What's on clear is how a fund would handle redemption requests prior to the 10 year mark is the fund is seeking to achieve maximum tax benefits for the investors.     

    We are currently working with our securities attorneys on setting up an opportunity fund for deals that we already have under contract within opportunity zones throughout the Southeast.   The challenge that we're facing is that the legislation in its current form is substantially lacking the details necessary to clearly define the business plan for the fund.  

    See this reply in the discussion

    37 Replies

    Jump to latestLatest
    • Investor · Powell, OH · Member since 2017 · 37 posts · 21 votes
      8y

      Do you have to put the gains into a "fund" or can you invest on your own within an opportunity zone?

    • Bjorn AhlbladPro Member
      Investor · Shelton, WA · Member since 2017 · 6k+ posts · 6k+ votes
      8y

      Sounds like a lot of risk and undue control to me. I’d rather pay the tax and make a better (albeit somewhat smaller) investment!

    • Accountant · Philadelphia, PA · Member since 2013 · 303 posts · 210 votes
      8y
      Originally posted by @Jon Blackburn:

      Do you have to put the gains into a "fund" or can you invest on your own within an opportunity zone?

       So we don't have final regs but it seems like you can start a partnership and invest in opportunity zones and that would qualify as a opportunity fund.

    • Specialist · Virginia Beach · Member since 2018 · 42 posts · 9 votes
      8y

      Yes you can start a partnership so long as it was established after 12/31/17 and for the purposes of operating a fund. There are rules such as 90% or more of the fund has to be used to either purchase and develop original use property or fund a property with substantial improvement of which there is rules about x % of fund being used as substantial improvement relative to purchase price. 

      If considering a partnership make sure the operating agreement is very very very thorough. All things considered with the recent letters sent to Dept. of Treasury specifically asking for more clarification about zone partnerships and zone business property investments. Initially it seems to make the most sense to invest for zone stock as a whole in a pooled asset fund. 

      Biggest benefit instead of paying the gain tax is the tax free gains and growth after the 10 year mark. Between the 15% step up in basis at 7 years 1 day and the additional FMV realized at 10years 1 day it makes sense to defer and hold as long as possible.

    • Flipper/Rehabber · Los Angeles, CA · Member since 2009 · 1k+ posts · 732 votes
      8y
      Been reading a bit about these opportunity zones recently , but have some questions. Is one able to sell a personal residence and then use the proceeds to invest in an opportunity fund or does the property have to be a rental ? If it needs to have been a rental/investment property is there a certain length of time requirement? Example “property must of been a rental for 1 year “etc ? Also since there is a requirement for the property to be substantially improved and rehab costs needs to exceed acquisition costs within 30 months it seems these would mostly be new development projects or major redevelopments ? I imagine there wouldn’t be income paid out at least in the beginning versus someone buying say an apartment building directly ? Holding for 10 years is a big incentive due to the elimination of capital gains , but if one did pull out of the fund earlier would there be some kind of penalty ? How easy would it be ? Is it more like a syndication where the investment can be tied up for several years or more like a mutual fund where one can sell their shares pretty easily ? Also what are some typical expected returns being offered ?
    • Investor · New York, NY · Member since 2016 · 105 posts · 118 votes
      8y

      @Joseph M. as it relates to real estate investments within an Opportunity Zone, you would need to double your basis in the property within 30 months.  Unless you're buying and rehabbing a highly distressed multi-family property, the program is a better fit for ground-up development or adaptive re-use/redevelopment type of projects.    What is still clear as it relates to the timeline is when the 30-month clock would start.  For example, if I buy a piece of land and it takes me 12-months to receive entitlements, do those 12 months count against my 30 month deadline or does the clock only start once I have approvals?

      In terms of holding period, to achieve the maximum benefit you would need to hold the fund for at least 10 years.  If you only hold for 5 years then your tax bill on your original gain is reduced by 10%.  Hold for 7 years the savings go up to 15%.   What's on clear is how a fund would handle redemption requests prior to the 10 year mark is the fund is seeking to achieve maximum tax benefits for the investors.     

      We are currently working with our securities attorneys on setting up an opportunity fund for deals that we already have under contract within opportunity zones throughout the Southeast.   The challenge that we're facing is that the legislation in its current form is substantially lacking the details necessary to clearly define the business plan for the fund.  

    • Investor · Phoenix, AZ · Member since 2017 · 583 posts · 919 votes
      8y

      @Account Closed, where did you find information on this 30-month requirement? I've been reading a lot about this, and haven't seen that anywhere. 

    • Flipper/Rehabber · Los Angeles, CA · Member since 2009 · 1k+ posts · 732 votes
      8y
      @Ruben Guerrero Thanks . It seems there are still quite a few questions in the air due to it being a newly announced program /incentive . Makes sense to get the process started soon though to get ahead of the game . Best of luck with your fund
    • Flipper/Rehabber · Los Angeles, CA · Member since 2009 · 1k+ posts · 732 votes
      8y
      Originally posted by @Sam Grooms:

      @Account Closed, where did you find information on this 30-month requirement? I've been reading a lot about this, and haven't seen that anywhere. 

       I saw it mentioned in this document from Citibank.  The PDF gives a good overview and outline of the benefits and definitions of an opportunity zone .

      "For real estate, QOZBP must generally be new construction or “substantially improved”, effectively meaning that rehab costs over 30 months must exceed acquisition cost"

      "https://www.citibank.com/icg/sa/citicommunitycapit...

      I also heard it mentioned by on a "Real Crowd" podcast featuring Derek Uldricks of Virtua Partners  http://virtuapartners.com/  they are global private equity firm focused on commercial real estate and look to be very experienced.  They have multiple offices in the U.S and Hong Kong as well. 

      Link to the podcast is below , the podcast episode was focused on opportunity zone investing and found it interesting .

      https://www.realcrowd.com/blog/2018/08/podcast-lea...

    • Flipper/Rehabber · Los Angeles, CA · Member since 2009 · 1k+ posts · 732 votes
      8y

      Just found this from the government website. 

      (ii) Substantial improvement

      For purposes of subparagraph (A)(ii), property shall be treated as substantially improved by the qualified opportunity fund only if, during any 30-month period beginning after the date of acquisition of such property, additions to basis with respect to such property in the hands of the qualified opportunity fund exceed an amount equal to the adjusted basis of such property at the beginning of such 30-month period in the hands of the qualified opportunity fund.

      Link: http://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title26-section1400Z-2&num=0&edition=prelim

    • Member since 2018 · 5 posts · 0 votes
      8y

      The substantial improvement clause is confusing.

      Lets assume I purchase a qualifying home with the intent of using it as a rental business.  I pay $100000 for the property.  I start to rent it immediately and depreciate it 3% each year on the 27 year table.  for simple math, lets say I do this for 7.5 years at which point the property basis is reduced to 77500.  In that last 30 months of the 10 years, I need to add additions of worth $77500 making the basis $155000 or do I simply need to insure the basis is greater than 77500 after 30 months?

      I think I found my answer:  

      (ii) Substantial improvement

      For purposes of subparagraph (A)(ii), property shall be treated as substantially improved by the qualified opportunity fund only if, during any 30-month period beginning after the date of acquisition of such property, additions to basis with respect to such property in the hands of the qualified opportunity fund exceed an amount equal to the adjusted basis of such property at the beginning of such 30-month period in the hands of the qualified opportunity fund.

      So the additions need to be in the amount of the Basis at the start of the 30 month period.  It need not double the basis -- but in my example above, additions in the amount of $77500 would be required during that 30 month period.

    • Member since 2018 · 5 posts · 0 votes
      8y

      So if you have to improve the property, and an Opportunity Fund must have 90% of its funds invested or be fined.

      Where does the funds for improvement come from?

      Example:  I take 100K in capital gains, create my OZF and by 100K in shares, the OZF purchases a property for 50K, it needs to do something with the other 50K (40K) or risk being fined.   If it takes more than 6 months to improve the property by the 50K level -- you would be exposed to fines.  

      Arguably it could come from a second investment of Cap gains (or other funds), but the original 100K needs to be utilized at 90%.

    • Flipper/Rehabber · Los Angeles, CA · Member since 2009 · 1k+ posts · 732 votes
      8y

      @Mike Seningen yeah that's why it seems like it is more practical to invest in a fund passively if wanting to take advantage of this... Imagine doing it right to follow the rules would cost a lot of attorneys fees and time for an individual investor...

      If you have 100k to invest but then are spending a bunch of  it on legal fees and paperwork there goes the tax savings right?..

      Kind of like doing a real estate syndication doesn't make sense for smaller projects since the legal fees (and regulations) are so high.

    • Mandy CohenPro Member
      Sonoma, CA · Member since 2018 · 16 posts · 4 votes
      8y

      Good information. Makes me need to rethink my plans. Besides looking for an investment opportunity, I am very much interested in helping the economic growth of the targeted Opportunity Zone in close proximity to me. Sounds like it would be best to find a fund that is already planning to develop that area. 

    • Investor · Sugar Land, TX · Member since 2017 · 19 posts · 4 votes
      7y

      Done lots of reading on this and seems like there is no minimum notional requirement for property purchase. I'm thinking the BRRRR strategy would be the perfect way for investors are participate in the QOZ in relatively small notional? i.e.

      1. Setup legal entity per QOZ requirement

      2. Buy/Acquire SFR or multifamily property in severe disrepair where repair cost >= acquisition cost

      3. Repair within 30 months of acquisition

      4.  Rent, Refinance, Repeat

      5. Hold for more than 10 years to have 0 capital gains tax

      Still not sure about investing with unrealized capital gains from other assets since you have to realize it in 2026, and I take that to mean tax payable in 2017.  Think there is still an argument for 1031 exchange if you want to defer tax indefinitely versus saving tax on 15% with 7 year holding period and paying it in 2027.  For new funds finding deals in QOZ with the right return numbers, major industries, population growth, this seems like a no brainer.

    • Investor · Minneapolis, MN · Member since 2016 · 139 posts · 143 votes
      7y

      @Patrick Ma keep in mind that investments in OZ's must rise to the level of a "trade or business" which is a grey area in the tax code. The proposed regulations just came out yesterday so we will be diving into them over the following week.

      Would a single single or multi-family home investment or two be considered a trade or business? Debatable. 

      Would a large apartment building with professional management qualify as a business? Most likely.

      On the surface though if the BRRRR strategy does qualify it could be a great vehicle to building wealth through OZ's.

      Especially if you plan on selling anything before you die (which in that case would make it better than a 1031). Another key point is that investors must have capital gains to invest in OZ's.

    • Member since 2018 · 5 posts · 0 votes
      7y

      Question about the 10% penalty and the time to put capital gains to work.

      Let's assume I create an opportunity zone fund on the 180th day after I observe the capital gains.

      It appears to me I have another 180 days to fully invest that capital before being subject to the 10% penalty clause.

      If I start the OZF prior to the 180th day, even if I don't invest any capital -- I think I define the 180 day wickets.  So in the opposite situation -- if I create the OZF the day after observing my gains, I have 181 days to be fully invested.

    • Member since 2018 · 5 posts · 0 votes
      7y

      Question:

      I would like to setup a structure where the management of the OZB has an equity stake in the OZB.

      If I have an OZF which buys a business which meets all the criteria of a OZB.  That business is structured to have shares and disperses shares of that business to other parties -- but doesn't sell the underlying assets of the OZB until the 10 year period.

      Is the dispersement of the shares considered a "sale"?

      If after 10 years the underlying asset was sold -- would the entire asset be free from capital gains, or just the % owned by the OZF?

      If the OZB was setup first, dispersed the shares -- then the OZF purchased the remaining shares, it seem pretty clear that the % would be related to the % of the OZB that was owned by the OZF.

    • Member since 2018 · 5 posts · 0 votes
      7y
      Originally posted by @Patrick Ma:

      Done lots of reading on this and seems like there is no minimum notional requirement for property purchase. I'm thinking the BRRRR strategy would be the perfect way for investors are participate in the QOZ in relatively small notional? i.e.

      1. Setup legal entity per QOZ requirement

      2. Buy/Acquire SFR or multifamily property in severe disrepair where repair cost >= acquisition cost

      3. Repair within 30 months of acquisition

      4.  Rent, Refinance, Repeat

      5. Hold for more than 10 years to have 0 capital gains tax

      Still not sure about investing with unrealized capital gains from other assets since you have to realize it in 2026, and I take that to mean tax payable in 2017.  Think there is still an argument for 1031 exchange if you want to defer tax indefinitely versus saving tax on 15% with 7 year holding period and paying it in 2027.  For new funds finding deals in QOZ with the right return numbers, major industries, population growth, this seems like a no brainer.

      I think the OZF is geared towards non-real estate capital gains. I.e. extract wealth out of stock market and apply it to OZF. Aside from that, your BRRRRR method might work to ultimately leverage your initial investment. The OZF rules suggest you can't invest with a mortgage, but I think you can use investments as collateral once they exist. So if I understand things, the initial investment has to be cash from capital gains, plus cash for the refurbishment also from capital gains. Then you can do your BRRRRR (I think). After 10 years (or later), you sell your hard assets -- I believe you can then collect all your returns capital gains free.

    • Real Estate Broker · Seattle, WA · Member since 2014 · 1k+ posts · 427 votes
      7y
      Originally posted by @Mike Seningen:
      Originally posted by @Patrick Ma:

      Done lots of reading on this and seems like there is no minimum notional requirement for property purchase. I'm thinking the BRRRR strategy would be the perfect way for investors are participate in the QOZ in relatively small notional? i.e.

      1. Setup legal entity per QOZ requirement

      2. Buy/Acquire SFR or multifamily property in severe disrepair where repair cost >= acquisition cost

      3. Repair within 30 months of acquisition

      4.  Rent, Refinance, Repeat

      5. Hold for more than 10 years to have 0 capital gains tax

      Still not sure about investing with unrealized capital gains from other assets since you have to realize it in 2026, and I take that to mean tax payable in 2017.  Think there is still an argument for 1031 exchange if you want to defer tax indefinitely versus saving tax on 15% with 7 year holding period and paying it in 2027.  For new funds finding deals in QOZ with the right return numbers, major industries, population growth, this seems like a no brainer.

      I think the OZF is geared towards non-real estate capital gains. I.e. extract wealth out of stock market and apply it to OZF. Aside from that, your BRRRRR method might work to ultimately leverage your initial investment. The OZF rules suggest you can't invest with a mortgage, but I think you can use investments as collateral once they exist. So if I understand things, the initial investment has to be cash from capital gains, plus cash for the refurbishment also from capital gains. Then you can do your BRRRRR (I think). After 10 years (or later), you sell your hard assets -- I believe you can then collect all your returns capital gains free.

      Your gains would be your down payment and you can leverage that down payment by financing your acquisition and remodel costs. Then you can refinance after you are done and continue using that extra cash out to buy more and more opp zone properties. Then after 10 years, you could sell everything and collect gains tax free.

    • Denver, CO · Member since 2017 · 27 posts · 13 votes
      7y

      Grave digging here but in my reading about the opportunity zone funds, I thought you could avoid the substantial improvement all together by using the property as it original use:

      "The original use of such property in the Opportunity Zone commences with the Fund or the Fund substantially improves the property; " 

      https://www.dykema.com/resources-alerts-qualified_...

      That seems to make me think a duplex would qualify

    • Investor · Phoenix, AZ · Member since 2017 · 583 posts · 919 votes
      7y
      Originally posted by @Nick P.:

      Grave digging here but in my reading about the opportunity zone funds, I thought you could avoid the substantial improvement all together by using the property as it original use:

      "The original use of such property in the Opportunity Zone commences with the Fund or the Fund substantially improves the property; " 

      https://www.dykema.com/resources-alerts-qualified_...

      That seems to make me think a duplex would qualify

      Interesting. I haven't heard this interpretation at any of the conferences I've been to, and I'd be surprised if that's correct. The motivation for this tax exemption was to spur investment in areas that need improving. If you aren't required to improve the property, how is their goal being achieved? 

    • Natalie KolodijBusiness Member
      Moderator
      Tax Strategist| National Tax Educator| Accepting New Clients · Member since 2014 · 3k+ posts · 4k+ votes
      7y
      Originally posted by @Nick P.:

      Grave digging here but in my reading about the opportunity zone funds, I thought you could avoid the substantial improvement all together by using the property as it original use:

      "The original use of such property in the Opportunity Zone commences with the Fund or the Fund substantially improves the property; " 

      https://www.dykema.com/resources-alerts-qualified_...

      That seems to make me think a duplex would qualify

      I have read nothing (Including several Tax professional training) that lead any thing to this being true. 

      I think it's being taken out of context- the IRS address original use with pertinence to land use. 

      https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/rr-18-29.pdf

    • Natalie KolodijBusiness Member
      Moderator
      Tax Strategist| National Tax Educator| Accepting New Clients · Member since 2014 · 3k+ posts · 4k+ votes
      7y
      Originally posted by @Nick P.:

      Grave digging here but in my reading about the opportunity zone funds, I thought you could avoid the substantial improvement all together by using the property as it original use:

      "The original use of such property in the Opportunity Zone commences with the Fund or the Fund substantially improves the property; " 

      https://www.dykema.com/resources-alerts-qualified_...

      That seems to make me think a duplex would qualify

      Here is a good breakdown - It's basically saying if you BUILD NEW in the fund, TO then start renting. It qualifies. 

      OR

      IF it was already an existing rental- you NEED to meet the substantial improvement test. 

      Property is treated as substantially improved by the qualified opportunity fund only if, during any 30-month period beginning after the date of acquisition of such property, additions to basis with respect to such property in the hands of the qualified opportunity fund exceed an amount equal to the adjusted basis of such property at the beginning of the 30-month period in the hands of the qualified opportunity fund.

      Example 3: On June 1, 2018, a qualified opportunity fund purchases an existing office building in an opportunity zone for $100 and continues to lease space in the office building to the historic tenants. Because the office building was already in use when the qualified opportunity fund acquired it, the original use of the office building in the qualified opportunity zone did not commence with the qualified opportunity fund. 

      However, the office building still can satisfy the definition of qualified opportunity zone business property if the qualified opportunity fund “substantially improves” the property by making improvements to the office building that increase the adjusted basis of the office building in the hands of the qualified opportunity fund to more than $200 over a 30-month period.

    • Denver, CO · Member since 2017 · 27 posts · 13 votes
      7y

      Ahhhh I see, thanks for the clarification. That “substantial improvement” needs to be greater than your initial cost basis people have seemed to allude?  So really they opportunity here is for the pseudo 1031 or new development. 

      Meh I’ll just start the next google in an opportunity zone and avoid cap gains in 10 years.  This could be done as operations and business must be in the zone (90%) but income can be derived from outside the zone (ie. Online biz) Am I interpreting that wrong as well?

    Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.