Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Private Lending & Conventional Mortgage Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 2 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

295
Posts
34
Votes
Burt L.
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Steamboat, CO
34
Votes |
295
Posts

Is FHA More Lenient About DTI When Using Cosigner Than Conventional?

Burt L.
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Steamboat, CO
Posted

I will be seeking either a 3% Conventional or 3.5% FHA loan. Credit is at 715-720 (720 is much better) but I will have a high DTI and can obtain a family cosigner with significant income and low debt.

My understanding is that FHA doesn't set the loan rates, but a FHA lender does and assesses the loan risk. I suspect that a conventional lender would be quicker to put me in a high risk category even with a cosigner and that an FHA lender would have to follow guildelines and would be more lenient on the "combined" DTI of myself and the cosigner - as a Conventilonal lender can have their own overlays, so to speak.

The permanent PMI isn't so attractive with an FHA loan. Is there any known difference on how Conventional treats DTI with a cosigner vs FHA. Conventional may not even allow a cosigner, for all I know. Thank you.

Loading replies...