Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Private Lending & Conventional Mortgage Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 10 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

90
Posts
19
Votes
Carrie Hallensleben
  • Investor
  • Kansas City, MO
19
Votes |
90
Posts

paying cash vs. taking a loan

Carrie Hallensleben
  • Investor
  • Kansas City, MO
Posted

We are trying to close a buy & hold deal and at this point the financing looks like it will go through. However, our thoughts were we'd do our renovations, get a tenant and then refi to get some of the equity out. Now we are wondering if it is better to just pay cash for it (we have HELOC money and savings available) and then do the work, get it rented and go about getting a loan after the fact. My husband feels this will help us not pay closing costs twice. Is there a great difference between closing a cash deal over a financed deal? I know there are title company fees. We are in KC, MO if that makes a difference. Thanks for advice!!

Loading replies...