Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Private Lending & Conventional Mortgage Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

9
Posts
1
Votes
Mark Carbonaro
  • New to Real Estate
  • Haddon Heights, NJ
1
Votes |
9
Posts

PMI: FHA vs. Bank/ Credit Union

Mark Carbonaro
  • New to Real Estate
  • Haddon Heights, NJ
Posted

Hi there,

I'm looking to house hack a small multi-family property and am thinking of different financing options. I plan to occupy one unit of the residence for at least a year and rent out the other(s).

In looking to get a loan with an LTV > 80%, the two options I'm considering are:

-Get an FHA mortgage, put 3.5%-5% down, and refinance 12 months after closing to get rid of the monthly PMI expense.

-Get a non-FHA mortgage, pay the recurring PMI at first- knowing it will (hopefully) go away after I've built up 20-22%+ equity in the property.

Assuming consistent PMI costs and interest rates between options (before &/ after refi), the only scenario in which I can see the second option being more beneficial is if I had put enough money down to hit that 20-22% equity level within the first 12 months.

This seems implausible due to mortgage payments barely paying off any principle in the first year, not to mention I'd think the only way I could attain that level of equity so quickly is if I had put down 15%-18% initially, which virtually eliminates the benefits of a "low" down payment.

I don't have any specific properties, institutions, or rates in mind, and while I'm sure these questions would be more easily answered on a case-by-case basis, what are some considerations I may be overlooking? Any constructive input on this topic is greatly appreciated.

Thanks!

~Mark Carbonaro

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,611
Posts
1,234
Votes
Chris K.
  • Attorney
  • Nashville, TN
1,234
Votes |
1,611
Posts
Chris K.
  • Attorney
  • Nashville, TN
Replied

@Mark Carbonaro

If you think of it from an IRR perspective (meaning you are forced to think about when you are going to sell this property), it's almost always better to use less of your own money. I don't want to speak in generalities, but I will rather pay more in interest rates and suffer through any other expenses like PMI if it means I don't have to use as much as my own money.

You might be overthinking here --- I don't know how expensive of a property you are looking at, but I have a hard time seeing PMI costs derailing a deal. I suppose that could happen if you are in an area where small multi-families sell at SFR prices (meaning property value scale faster than the rent that it generates). But overall, I would focus on finding the right property instead of worrying about PMI costs.

I wish I could house hack as well. Do it before you get married --- many spouses are not into it!  

Disclaimer: While I’m an attorney licensed to practice in PA, I’m not your attorney. What I wrote above does not create an attorney/client relationship between us. I wrote the above for informational purposes. Do not rely on it as legal advice. Always consult with your attorney before you rely on the above information.

Loading replies...