Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Private Lending & Conventional Mortgage Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

21
Posts
1
Votes
Mike Joesph
  • Chicago, IL
1
Votes |
21
Posts

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

565
Posts
200
Votes
Marty Johnston
  • Lender
  • Wauwatosa, WI
200
Votes |
565
Posts
Marty Johnston
  • Lender
  • Wauwatosa, WI
Replied

@Mike Joesph, Both! You can do either or. Typically, it's actually less common for lenders to allow blanketing of properties, and those who do require all properties to be very close to each other (same city) or some even require side-by-side properties to blanket. But you have both options.

If you do 4 separate loans, keep in mind that will be 4 separate underwritings, and 4 sets of closing costs - they're all based on a loan amount percentage typically, so this won't break your bank, but will likely add  some fees. The benefit however of doing 4 separate loans is that you then have the ability to refinance, sell, or reposition each property individually down the road, something that is more difficult to do when blanketing all properties under one mortgage.

Hope this helps!

Marty J

  • Marty Johnston
  • [email protected]
  • (414) 600-0123
  • Loading replies...