Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Private Lending & Conventional Mortgage Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

52
Posts
9
Votes
April Adams
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
9
Votes |
52
Posts

HELOC for Non-Owner Occupied quadraplex

April Adams
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
Posted

Is ANYONE doing non-owner occupied HELOC's in Los Angeles or am I chasing my tail?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

292
Posts
325
Votes
Al D.
  • Investor
  • San Francisco, CA
325
Votes |
292
Posts
Al D.
  • Investor
  • San Francisco, CA
Replied

I recently learned that Union Bank can do it in Northern California. They also have branches around you. Of course, you could also go online.

https://www.unionbank.com

Unfortunately, the branch I went to does not seem to be fully staffed, and the process since then has also been lacking. My case has limited w-2 income, and I am not sure that the underwriter understands how to properly account for other income. That is not unusual, but lack of willingness to tell you exactly what is lacking - rather than just deny you - is not a good business practice. The situation may be improved by having a loan officer as your advocate - could not find such in my case up here. Appealing to someone in charge at the moment.

Loading replies...