Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Private Lending & Conventional Mortgage Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 6 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

8
Posts
1
Votes
Brian Webb
  • Tri-Cities Area, WA
1
Votes |
8
Posts

Reserves required for financing

Brian Webb
  • Tri-Cities Area, WA
Posted

I am a newbie and haven't done a deal other than my primary home which is a long term BRRR!

I am trying to get financing in place, or at least identify the institutions that I want to work with, so I spoke with the first bank yesterday. I started with this particular bank because I already have a good relationship with them through our family business. This bank said as part of their approval process on a residential investment property, they need to see 6 months in reserves for the rental and 2 months in reserves on my primary residence to cover the mortgage payments. Unless I misunderstood her, they need to see that for each additional rental property acquired. Has anyone else run into that? Is that a normal requirement?

I will be talking to more institutions and focusing on more local credit unions to find a portfolio lender, but this first meeting was a little disappointing.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

3,286
Posts
3,789
Votes
Andrew Johnson
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Encinitas, CA
3,789
Votes |
3,286
Posts
Andrew Johnson
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Encinitas, CA
Replied

@Brian Webb For whatever it's worth (others may disagree) I'd max out conventional loans first.  You get a 30-year fixed-rate and interest rates are still historically low.  You don't have to worry about a 20 or 25 year amortization table.  You don't have to worry about balloon payments (and refinancing) in 5-7 years.  You don't have to worry about what interest rates will be in 5 or 7 years.  You don't have to worry about sending annual financials to the bank.  And I'm probably missing a couple of things.  And it's not that any of these things are a BIG deal or a monumental hassle.  I like my lender.  There's never been an issue.  I'm sure they'd be happy to loan me more money.  

But would I rather be able to have a straight-up boring 30-year fixed-rate mortgage on my apartments?  Absolutely.

Loading replies...