Skip to content
Two investors reviewing resources on a laptop

Get industry-leading resources — for free

Unlock resources for every investing strategy and stage with a free account.

By continuing, you agree to BiggerPockets LLC's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Private Lending & Conventional Mortgage Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

User Stats

62
Posts
21
Votes
Ian Livaich
  • Attorney
  • Cherry Hill, NJ
21
Votes |
62
Posts

Legal Consequences of Using Private Money

Ian Livaich
  • Attorney
  • Cherry Hill, NJ
Posted

Hello everyone,

I am considering using a family member as a private lender.  He would fully finance the property, including rehab costs.  Most importantly, I am trying to structure the deal in a way that best protects my family member's assets.  I don't have a property yet -- I am trying to understand the mechanics of private lending first.  Please let me know if I am missing something.

Q1: If my name is on the deed and a tenant were to sue me for some reason in regards to the property, I would be liable as my name is on the deed but not my family member as the private lender, correct? 

Q2: Further, if we execute a promissory note and deed of trust to secure his investment and record that lien with the county and a tenant successfully sued me and forced the sale of the property, would my family member, as the first position lien holder, receive what he is owed FIRST, then the tenant receives the remainder (if any)?  

Q3: Would the combination of a promissory note and deed of trust deter an attorney representing a tenant from suing me because I have no equity in the property?  In other words, similar to a conventional loan where I would only have 20% of equity in the property, in this scenario, I would own 0% of equity in the property while the the private lender controls 100% of the property through the "mortgage."

Thanks for your help in advance. 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,086
Posts
549
Votes
David Weintraub
  • Lender
  • Berkeley, CA
549
Votes |
1,086
Posts
David Weintraub
  • Lender
  • Berkeley, CA
Replied

Justin Krik, attorney, Cherry Hill.  Lipsky Brandt.  Give him a call. 

Loading replies...