Trust Deed Investments: California SB 978 Suitability Reqs

Trust Deed Investments: California SB 978 Suitability Reqs

Lender · Los Angeles, CA · Member since 2012 · 147 posts · 76 votes

I saw earlier posts about the new law, SB 978, investor suitability requirements for trust deed investments.

California now requires that when selling or brokering all of, or an interest in trust deed investments, hard money lenders and other providers have to:

1) obtain information about the investor, some of which was not necessarily required under previous law, including, but not limited to

* net worth
* other investments
* education or investment experience / level of sophistication
* career history
* age
* income
* tolerance for risk

There is a new form from the California Department of Real Estate that can be used to gather some of the information.

The form, although it asks questions some of my investors are not exactly thrilled to answer, is not all that bad.

2) The big part is that we now have to "consider the investor's circumstance and whether or not the investment is suitable for them."

That's where it gets a little more complex. Obviously, the 84 year old with only 100,000 in investable assets should not put 75,000 into a hard money construction loan - but many of the investment choices are not as clear cut.

3) 3rd new requirement: Previously, when we found an investor (1 investor) for a whole loan, there were a lot fewer requirements than when we placed multiple investors into a fractionalized loan, where each investor buys less than a 100% interest in the loan.

Now, investors in whole loans will benefit from a number of the restrictions and protections that previously applied only to investors in fractionalized loans, AND the same requirements (1 and 2 above) apply to whole loan investments.

I'm attending a conference soon, where extensive coverage of the topic will be provided.

I'm working with some attorneys and other trust deed investment providers to come up with procedures to fulfill the requirements, especially the more challenging # 2 above.

I think investments in California trust deeds will now be somewhat safer as a result of this. We (providers of trust deed investments) have a lot to implement here and those of us that do it right will likely face less competition. Some won't, or won't know how to comply......and sooner or later they'll be gone.

Joffrey Long

0Reply
159 views

27 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Investor, Entrepreneur, Educator · Springfield, MO · Member since 2009 · 21k+ posts · 12k+ votes
    13y

    quote=Joffrey Long] “Known Your Customer” and related “Suitability” rules that stock brokers must comply with. I wonder about the parallels and how well those have been working in that industry, as well as if there are any lessons learned that could be applicable.

    Part of a bank examination is the assessment of the quality and maturity distribution of the bank's investment portfolio, something I usually ended up doing along with loans. The good part is that banks can't hold stock, so it's a bond portfolio.

    But, with suitability issues with individual investors, the broker's defense will always be to show the sophistication of the investor and net worth. I'd say the parallel is pretty much the same, in fact identical as the terms were probably adopted here putting the same responsibility on a MB.

    Stocks and bonds are rated, your mortgage is not so it will be very difficult to peg any mortgage as being suitable for almost any investor unless they have had mortgage lending experience.

    I had over a thousand loans/contracts in portfolio servicing and that pool was not large enough nor diversified to the area to set a rating (I also investigated the issue with Moody's and it was a joke with such a small pool and costs involved, I dropped that real quick).

    Back on point, if brokers take an average investor away from vinilla investments the likelyhood of them defending against suitable and appropriate is slim, I've had this discussion with several brokers and they avoid such issues. When a brokerage ends up covering losses of an investor it's usually on these grounds, the lack of due diligence.

  • Lender · California and Florida · Member since 2008 · 319 posts · 194 votes
    13y

    For those interested in seeing the DRE Investor Questionnaire

    http://www.dre.ca.gov/files/word/re870.docx

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.