Take higher cash on cash return by using an 85% LTV (w/ PMI) vs 80% LTV?

Take higher cash on cash return by using an 85% LTV (w/ PMI) vs 80% LTV?

Matthew MuellerPro Member
Rental Property Investor · Hoboken, NJ · Member since 2010 · 40 posts · 6 votes

Hello all,

I've run numbers on what I think are fairly conservative possibilities regarding a property and the question comes down to this.

My CCR is almost 1.5% higher even after taking into account monthly PMI costs if I go with an 85% LTV vs an 80% conforming one.

The obvious tradeoff is lower nominal cashflows esp because of a higher P&I cost, and lower equity, with more 'dead' cashflow going to PMI. But should I care given the above information?

The swing is $50 less per month to have to put 5% less down; which in this market would be 25% of another down payment (due to fees for processing etc)!

0Reply
28 views

2 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Real Estate Professional · West Palm Beach, FL · Member since 2012 · 23k+ posts · 13k+ votes
    12y

    COC is all well and good, but it means nothing if that other 5% isn't put to work, and is just sitting there. I'd put the 20% down. I assume you're talking conventional, not FHA.

  • Investor · Willow Spring, NC · Member since 2013 · 788 posts · 285 votes
    12y
    I'd put the 20% down. PMI is wasted money and you would get the better cash flow with little less COC.
Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.