Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Creative Real Estate Financing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 12 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

14
Posts
2
Votes
Brooke Isbell
  • Brentwood, TN
2
Votes |
14
Posts

Waiting periods after financial events

Brooke Isbell
  • Brentwood, TN
Posted

Just wanted to start a discussion here and see what others are thinking. I heard economists speculating recently that since the Fed is saying they will not raise interest rates for at least another year or two, that banks will now be forced to loosen the reigns and starting lending again. My question was "to whom?" It certainly won't be to the unemployed. So then I saw some random article about banks possibly eliminating the waiting periods after foreclosures, bankruptcies and/or short sales to those who otherwise qualify (financially recovered, high incomes, etc). This would however, potentially create a situation where "squatters" are rewarded for strategically defaulting. In all fairness, the article I read (that speculated banks might waive these waiting periods) was only one article and I found nothing else to support that information. Just wondering if there is any truth to that, since doing so would mean the buying pool would become quite large again very quickly and housing prices would rise at least in the short term. Thoughts?

Loading replies...