Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 2 years ago on . Most recent reply presented by

User Stats

57
Posts
35
Votes
Karl Kauper
  • Investor
  • Tinton Falls, NJ
35
Votes |
57
Posts

When Can RE losses not be taken against ordinary W2 income?

Karl Kauper
  • Investor
  • Tinton Falls, NJ
Posted

My accountant stated, “The losses incurred on the rental properties cannot be taken and will be carried forward as your income exceeds $150k, thus no losses can be taken against your ordinary W2 income.”

I was really surprised by this. My wife and I had significant net losses on our Ohio property (mainly because of renovations) and a DE vacation rental, so I expected that these losses would help to offset some of our W2 income with respect to taxes (my wife and I both live and work in NJ). We own the Ohio property via an LLC and we own the DE property in our personal names (in case relevant). My accountant says No — the losses have to be carried forward. Is this accurate? I thought a major benefit of RE ownership is that any losses can offset other taxable income??

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

175
Posts
152
Votes
Vicki X.
  • Investor
152
Votes |
175
Posts
Vicki X.
  • Investor
Replied
Quote from @Karl Kauper:

My accountant stated, “The losses incurred on the rental properties cannot be taken and will be carried forward as your income exceeds $150k, thus no losses can be taken against your ordinary W2 income.”

I was really surprised by this. My wife and I had significant net losses on our Ohio property (mainly because of renovations) and a DE vacation rental, so I expected that these losses would help to offset some of our W2 income with respect to taxes (my wife and I both live and work in NJ). We own the Ohio property via an LLC and we own the DE property in our personal names (in case relevant). My accountant says No — the losses have to be carried forward. Is this accurate? I thought a major benefit of RE ownership is that any losses can offset other taxable income??

 Check out 

Passive Activity Loss Rules

Loading replies...