Updated about 1 year ago on .
Most recent reply
presented by
Connecticut Section 168k Limitations
Just found out that Connecticut disallows section 168k & section 179 bonus depreciation. For reference, see: https://portal.ct.gov/-/media/drs/publications/ocg/ocg5bonus...
Is there an exemption to this rule or can bonus depreciation from a cost segregation study be applied via a different IRC code? Or any other tax strategy?
Thank you BP Nation.
Most Popular Reply

- Accountant
- Cincinnati OH 45245, USA
- 112
- Votes |
- 112
- Posts
I don't work in Connecticut enough to know this answer off-hand but a large majority of states that opt-out of bonus depreciation effectively pretend it doesn't exist. This means you would still get the 200% MACRS on most/all assets that would otherwise be subject to bonus depreciation.
Funnily enough, Ohio is not one of these states for my tax preparer friends who are looking for another reason not to work with Ohio :) (I live/work in Ohio, it's a wacky time). They instead use an alternative method separate from both of the mentioned methods.
- Benjamin Weinhart
- [email protected]
