Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated 12 days ago on . Most recent reply presented by

User Stats

62
Posts
54
Votes
Melanie Baldridge
  • -
54
Votes |
62
Posts

The "in-service" date

Melanie Baldridge
  • -
Posted

When thinking about depreciation it's not about when you buy the property, it is when you "put it into service."

When you buy determines your short/long term capital gains.

The "in-service" date = The point in time when you can start taking depreciation from.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

5,167
Posts
6,058
Votes
Michael Plaks
#1 Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation Contributor
  • Tax Accountant / Enrolled Agent
  • Houston, TX
6,058
Votes |
5,167
Posts
Michael Plaks
#1 Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation Contributor
  • Tax Accountant / Enrolled Agent
  • Houston, TX
Replied
Quote from @Gregory Wilson:
Quote from @Michael Plaks:
Quote from @Gregory Wilson:

I think you misunderstood. The offer to lease was "as is" and which is by definition in a state of readiness. Frankly, this thread should help the CPA's in the crowd understand why taxpayers often complain that their tax preparers are not aggressive enough. For my part I see this as okay. I can see a IRS Publication based approach to tax preparation. 


The offer to lease should be genuine. If it's under construction, it cannot be leased. If you want to call it "aggressive", be my guest.

A property under construction certainly can be leased. Where did you get that idea?

Not interested in arguing the obvious further. The Regs language is clear:

...Property is first placed in service when first placed in a condition or state of readiness and availability for a specifically assigned function,..

If you want to twist its meaning, go ahead, it's not my game.

PS. You may also want to review 2013 TC cases of a) Brown and b) Mears. 

  • Michael Plaks
  • Loading replies...