Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies

Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal



Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated almost 10 years ago on .
Most recent reply
presented by

50/50 Partnership legal costs and depreciation benefits?
Most Popular Reply

Off topic, but I am not a huge fan of partnerships when buying buy and hold properties. Here are a couple of reasons:
- You are both likely going to have to personally sign the loan. Though this may not seem like as issue now, being 50% of a conventional loan still counts against your Fannie / Freddie max loans
- Even though it may seem 'less risky' having a partner, you are likely still 100% liable for the debt if things go bad and your partner can't come up with cash. In general, I hate being liable for 100% of something and only getting 50% of the reward
- Partnerships are like marriage...so you better know each other's roles or eventually there will be trouble / bad feelings. If you both are bring money, credit and minimal experience - then from the surface I am not sure the value of a partner. It is almost like the blind leading the blind
You would think from the above I am not in any buy and hold partnerships but that isn't true. I have two:
- Phoenix: We are 50/50 money partners and 50/50 owners. I manage the books / finances / tenant screening and partners do property management / boots on the ground. This works really well as we are both getting something the other doesn't have / do well
-Midwest: Again 50/50 partners. I provide 100% of the cash for the deals and partner locates, rehabs, manages free of charge. I would only do 50/50 because the partner is adding so much value during the rehab and we hope to be close to no cash outlays after a portfolio refi.
I am not trying to discourage you from real estate but I do encourage you to really think of this will be a good longer-term fit or if you should fly solo.