Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 9 years ago on . Most recent reply presented by

User Stats

3
Posts
0
Votes
Rob S.
  • San Marcos, CA
0
Votes |
3
Posts

Rental Property Cost Basis

Rob S.
  • San Marcos, CA
Posted

Hi,

I have an interesting tax problem I was hoping someone could help me understand.  I think I've managed to screw myself over pretty badly, but I'm hoping there's some way to fix it!

Back in 2008 I bought a house as a primary residence for $260k.  3 years later, I ended up changing jobs and moving to a different state.  At the time the house had dropped in value (let's say I could have gotten around $230k), so I decided to make it a rental.

When doing my taxes that year, TurboTax had me choose an initial price for the depreciation.  At the time I had read some documentation saying I should use the assessed tax value of the building from my property tax statement, and I was young and naive, so I ended up using that which was around $120k.  My house is in an area where the tax assessed values are nowhere near the prices received when actually selling a house.

Now, I'm considering selling the rental to use as a down payment for a new house in my current state.  It's currently worth around $320k.  I have always been under the impression that my cost basis for capital gains purposes would be $260k - the depreciation I've taken (around $20k) = $240k.  However, I've been reading lately that my cost basis is actually the figure used for the depreciation, minus the actual depreciation taken.  In my case this would be $120k - $20k = $100k.

Is this correct?  Have I robbed myself of $140k in cost basis with no recompense?  This seems extremely harsh, so I'm hoping I'm mis-understanding something.  That would be an extreme amount and I would lose pretty much all the equity I've built up over the years.

If I am correct and my cost basis is actually $100k, is my only option to avoid a huge tax hit to attempt a 1031 exchange, or are there any other options available?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

9,134
Posts
9,469
Votes
Dave Foster
  • Qualified Intermediary for 1031 Exchanges
  • St. Petersburg, FL
9,469
Votes |
9,134
Posts
Dave Foster
  • Qualified Intermediary for 1031 Exchanges
  • St. Petersburg, FL
Replied

@Rob S., A good acct. can sort out your turbo tax connundrum.  One thing strikes me - The assessor's value was for building only which is the depreciable portion of your property.  However your basis should also include a basis in the land itself.  That would help.

Other than a 1031 you could do an installment sale.  You could move back in for a couple years.  Or pay the tax and thank Intuit.  I'd recommend a 200 dollar sit down with an acct first.

  • Dave Foster
business profile image
The 1031 Investor
5.0 stars
103 Reviews

Loading replies...