Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 8 years ago on . Most recent reply presented by

User Stats

2
Posts
0
Votes
Justin Burch
  • Waldorf, MD
0
Votes |
2
Posts

Depreciation without income?

Justin Burch
  • Waldorf, MD
Posted

I bought a rental on November 2, 2016. The house was put "In Service" according to the IRS (as in rent ready) by Thanksgiving, but lets say December 1st. The house was not rented until January 15th 2017. I am working on my taxes now with a CPA and she told me that the 1 month of 2016 depreciation cannot be captured because there was no passive income in 2016. I asked if that 1 month of depreciation can roll into 2017, she said no. I understand generally passive losses must deduct from passive income. But even if I cannot claim this depreciation in 2016 it seems to me the 1 month should at lease roll into 2017 because of the "in service" date.

1st question: When should the depreciation of this property start? "In service" date (Dec 1 2016) or rental start date (Jan 15, 2017)?

2nd question: Should all rent ready expenses plus certain closing costs be utilized as current year deductions, or be added to the total costs basis depreciation of the property over 27.5 years?

I have read the IRS 527 publication several times, and I do fall under the active participation clause with a MAGI under 100,000 to allow for $25,000 losses against earned income

Loading replies...