Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 8 years ago on . presented by

User Stats

13
Posts
0
Votes
Mark Caragio
  • Sunnyvale, CA
0
Votes |
13
Posts

AMT eats up suspended passive losses?

Mark Caragio
  • Sunnyvale, CA
Posted

After a 1031 exchange, my replacement properties are now generating taxable income.  These gains are offset in regular taxes by passive loss carry forwards, and not taxed until I run out of these carry forwards (I believe).  But this new income is fully taxed under AMT.

This makes it seem like the past losses have no value whatsoever.  The past losses will continue to decrease in regular tax until they get to zero, but I'm paying AMT taxes on every penny of them.

Do I have this wrong?  Is there any way to capture value for the past losses in this scenario?