All
Members
Companies
Blog
Forums
Podcast
Webinars
    User Log in  /  Sign up
  • Forums
    Newest Posts Trending Discussions Followed Forums Real Estate News & Current Events General Landlording & Rental Properties Buying & Selling Real Estate Deal Analysis See All
  • Education

    Read

    BiggerPockets Blog BPInsights: Expert Analysis Guides Glossary Reviews Member Blogs

    Watch

    Webinars Video Library Financial Independence Blueprint Intro to Real Estate: Rentals

    Listen

    BiggerPockets Real Estate Podcast BiggerPockets Money Podcast BiggerPockets Business Podcast Real Estate Rookie Podcast Daily Podcast (Audio Blog)

    Topics

    Business Operations Finance Finding Deals Property Management Property Types Strategy
  • Network

    Recommended Vendors

    Real Estate Agents Mortgage Lenders Hard Money Lenders Insurance Contractors Investment Companies Build Your Team

    Search

    Members Events Jobs
  • Tools

    Calculators

    Rental Property Fix and Flip BRRRR Rehab Estimator
    Wholesaling Mortgage Payment 70% Rule Airbnb

    Services

    BPInsights: Property Insights Tenant Screening Property Management Lease Agreement Packages

    New Feature

    BPInsights (beta)

    Quickly analyze a property address or ZIP Code to compare your rent in your neighborhood.

    Analyze a property
  • Find Deals
    Real Estate Listings Find Foreclosures External Link Ads, Jobs, and Other
  • Bookstore

    Real Estate Books

    Profit Like The Pros Bidding to Buy See all books

    Featured Book

    BiggerPockets Wealth Magazine book cover
    BiggerPockets Wealth Magazine

    Written by financial journalists and data scientists, get 60+ pages of newsworthy content, expert-driven advice, and data-backed research written in a clear way to help you navigate your tough investment decisions in an ever-changing financial climate! Subscribe today and get the Oct/Nov issue delivered to your door!

    Get the Magazine
  • Pricing
Log In Sign up
User
Quick search links
Podcast Hard Money Lenders Books Washington
ForumsArrowTax, Legal Issues, Contracts, Self-Directed IRAArrowAre all costs prior to placing a tenant considered purchase cost?
  • Newest Posts
    • Newest Posts
    • Unanswered Discussions
  • Trending
    • Top Discussions
    • Trending Discussions
  • Browse Forums
Search Nova
Create post

Are all costs prior to placing a tenant considered purchase cost?

40 Replies

  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on LinkedIn
Rotate Log in or sign up to reply
user profile avatar
  • Posts 47
  • Votes 21

Chris Sullens
from Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

posted over 3 years ago

So an experienced CPA recently told me that essentially all costs incurred prior to placing a tenant are considered to be acquisition costs and get written off only as depreciation. Is this true? I'm sure he knows what he is talking about, but I wanted some second opinions. Are there any expenses that are directly tax deductible which are incurred prior to placing a tenant? Or are all expenses taken as depreciation? This includes closing costs? Interest on mortgage payments? Utility bills? All rehab expenses? Everything? 

Rotate Log in or sign up to reply
user profile avatar
  • Posts 68
  • Votes 28

Gregory B.
from Brooklyn, New York

replied over 3 years ago

Utilities are deductible, everything else will be depreciated.

Rotate Log in or sign up to reply
user profile avatar
Check Rosette Top Subjects:
Tenants, Rentals, and Traditional Financing
  • Posts 2.2K
  • Votes 2.0K

Ashish Acharya
Accountant, CPA, CFP®, PFS from Atlanta, GA

replied over 3 years ago

@Chris Sullens 


Summary: You have  to capitalize work done but there is an exception for anything less than $2500

I think there can be two situations:

1) You convert your personal use home to rental:

You can deduct your ordinary and necessary expenses for managing, conserving, or maintaining rental property from the time you make it available for rent. Addition and improvement would be added to basis no matter if they are pre-rental or post-rental unless de minimis election of expensing $2500 is taken

2) You buy a new property for rental:

No matter if it is pre or post rental, the cost of any additions or improvements made before placing your property into service as a rental that has a useful life of more than 1 year is added to the basics like normal improvements, unless de minimis rule election is taken for items less than $2500.

This is a summary of the from IRS regulation:

“( (d) ) Acquired or produced tangible property—(1) Requirement to capitalize. Except as provided ….. and in § 1.263(a)-1(f) (providing a de minimis safe harbor election), a taxpayer must capitalize amounts paid to acquire or produce a unit of real or personal property”

See that "Except as provided ….. and in § 1.263(a)-1(f) (providing a de minimis safe harbor election)," exception, you can take de minimis safe harbor election.

e.g. Work performed prior to placing the property in service. In Year 1, M purchases a building for use as a business office. Prior to placing the building in service, M pays amounts to repair cement steps, refinish wood floors, patch holes in walls, and paint the interiors and exteriors of the building. In Year 2, M places the building in service and begins using the building as its business office ….Under paragraph (d)(1) of this section[Which is above], the amounts paid must be capitalized as amounts to acquire the building unit of property because they were for work performed prior to M's placing the building in service.

Similar to above, you do not have to capitalize everything: You can expense those work based on the de minimis rule. Taxpayers are limited to $2,500 per invoice or per item (as substantiated by the invoice).

Finally, After you make the house available for rent, you can deduct your ordinary and necessary expenses for managing, conserving, or maintaining rental property from the time you make it available for rent. 

Rotate Log in or sign up to reply
user profile avatar
  • Posts 47
  • Votes 21

Chris Sullens
from Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

replied over 3 years ago

Thanks @Ashish Acharya ! Regarding the de minimis rule, is that saying that any invoiced expense under $2500 can be deducted rather than capitalized? So, I had new flooring installed in this new rent house, but it cost me $2000. This is prior to any tenant being placed. Does that expense fall into the de minimis rule? What if I have several items like that and all together it's 12k worth of expenses? But each item is less than $2,500?

Rotate Log in or sign up to reply
user profile avatar
  • Posts 1.7K
  • Votes 831

Dave Toelkes
Investor from Pawleys Island, South Carolina

replied over 3 years ago

@Chris Sullens

Your CPA was not exactly correct.  All expenses incurred to make a property ready and available for service as a rental are capitalized.  There is no de minimis safe harbor here because the property is not yet in service as a rental.  

Once the property is ready and available for rent, you can expense repairs and start depreciation.  Ready and available for rent means that the property is officially "on the market" as a rental even though it may take some time to actually get a tenant under lease. So, amending your CPA's advice, all direct make-ready expenses incurred before the property is ready and available for service have to be capitalized.  

Rotate Log in or sign up to reply
user profile avatar
Check Rosette Top Subjects:
Tenants, Rentals, and Traditional Financing
  • Posts 2.2K
  • Votes 2.0K

Ashish Acharya
Accountant, CPA, CFP®, PFS from Atlanta, GA

replied over 3 years ago
Originally posted by @Chris Sullens :

Thanks @Ashish Acharya! Regarding the de minimis rule, is that saying that any invoiced expense under $2500 can be deducted rather than capitalized? So, I had new flooring installed in this new rent house, but it cost me $2000. This is prior to any tenant being placed. Does that expense fall into the de minimis rule? What if I have several items like that and all together it's 12k worth of expenses? But each item is less than $2,500?

New flooring of 2000 can be expensed. 

If the invoice has multiple items, you look at the items separately. you need to factor into taxes for those items too. Meaning, all the expenses are added to make one unit/Item ready ( shipping cost, taxes, installation and those kinds of stuff). There can be multiple items per invoice but can be looked at separately. 

Talk to you CPA, he should know this.  

Rotate Log in or sign up to reply
user profile avatar
Check Rosette Top Subject:
Taxes & Accounting
  • Posts 2.6K
  • Votes 3.4K

Linda Weygant
Investor and CPA from Arvada, Colorado

replied over 3 years ago
Originally posted by @Ashish Acharya :
Originally posted by @Chris Sullens:

Thanks @Ashish Acharya! Regarding the de minimis rule, is that saying that any invoiced expense under $2500 can be deducted rather than capitalized? So, I had new flooring installed in this new rent house, but it cost me $2000. This is prior to any tenant being placed. Does that expense fall into the de minimis rule? What if I have several items like that and all together it's 12k worth of expenses? But each item is less than $2,500?

New flooring of 2000 can be expensed. 

If the invoice has multiple items, you look at the items separately. you need to factor into taxes for those items too. Meaning, all the expenses are added to make one unit/Item ready ( shipping cost, taxes, installation and those kinds of stuff). There can be multiple items per invoice but can be looked at separately. 

Talk to you CPA, he should know this.  

 Ashish,  This is not correct.  What you are talking about are expenses that are incurred between tenants or during tenancy - essentially, after the property is placed in service.

For expenditures that are incurred before the property is placed in service, almost everything needs to be capitalized.  This includes labor and materials for repairs and improvements, interest on loans used for acquisition or repairs, property taxes, etc.  There are a few *possible* exceptions that have to do with services received currently vs services to be put into service later.  Some possibilities are:

1. HOA dues - if this is for current/ongoing maintenance of the property, then it's possible to expenses HOA dues right away.

2.  Utilities - if this is for current service to the property, then a case can be made for expensing utilities such as water and gas/electricity right away.

3.  Ongoing services - if you have to get the grass cut weekly during the remodel phase, then these ongoing services can also be expensed right away.  

4.  Services unrelated to the property.  If you are paying an accountant or lawyer for services unrelated to the actual property (such as bookkeeping or drawing up blank leases, etc), then that can be expensed right away.

5.  Other current items.  If you go to Starbucks to buy coffee for your work crews or grab sandwiches for them, then that can be immediately expensed.  

These items are usually small enough during the construction phase that it doesn't really make sense to separate them out, so if you choose to roll the first 3 into the basis, that is acceptable.  The second two examples should always be expensed and not added to basis.

Rotate Log in or sign up to reply
user profile avatar
Check Rosette Top Subjects:
Tenants, Rentals, and Traditional Financing
  • Posts 2.2K
  • Votes 2.0K

Ashish Acharya
Accountant, CPA, CFP®, PFS from Atlanta, GA

replied over 3 years ago

Linda, I appreciate your feedback.  This is IRS regulation §1.263(a)-2 

[This section discusses what needs to be capitalized and also gives the example of the work done to the property prior to placing in the service. It also gives exceptions on what does not need to be capitalized. I have bolded it]

"(d) Acquired or produced tangible property.

1.263(a)-2(d)(1)(1) Requirement to capitalize. Except as provided in §1.162-3 (relating to materials and supplies) and in §1.263(a)-1(f) (providing a de minimis safe harbor election), a taxpayer must capitalize amounts paid to acquire or produce a unit of real or personal property (as determined under §1.263(a)-3(e)), including leasehold improvements, land and land improvements, buildings, machinery and equipment, and furniture and fixtures. Section 1.263(a)-3(f) provides the rules for determining whether amounts are for leasehold improvements. Amounts paid to acquire or produce a unit of real or personal property include the invoice price, transaction costs as determined under paragraph (f) of this section, and costs for work performed prior to the date that the unit of property is placed in service by the taxpayer (without regard to any applicable convention under section 168(d)). A taxpayer also must capitalize amounts paid to acquire real or personal property for resale.

Examples. The following examples illustrate the rules of this paragraph (d). Unless otherwise provided, assume that the taxpayer does not elect the de minimis safe harbor under §1.263(a)-1(f) and that the property is not acquired for resale under section 263A."

[It says "assume that taxpayer does not elect the de minimis", which implies that taxpayer can elect for all the examples listed ]

[One of the examples is:] 

"Example (10). Work performed prior to placing the property in service. In Year 1, M purchases a building for use as a business office. Prior to placing the building in service, M pays amounts to repair cement steps, refinish wood floors, patch holes in walls, and paint the interiors and exteriors of the building. In Year 2, M places the building in service and begins using the building as its business office. Assume that the work that M performs does not constitute an improvement to the building or its structural components under §1.263(a)-3. Under §1.263-3(e)(2)(i), the building and its structural components is a single unit of property. Under paragraph (d)(1) of this section, the amounts paid must be capitalized as amounts to acquire the building unit of property because they were for work performed prior to M's placing the building in service."

[ As mention above, taxpayer could have elected to expense under de minimis because example assumes taxpayer didnt]

[ Also , if you look at the de minimis code below, it says specifically do not capitalize under sec 1.263(a)-2, which is above regulation that says you need to capitalize with exception of de minimis if you elect the de minimis.] 

"(f) De minimis safe harbor election.

(1) In general. Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (f)(2) of this section, a taxpayer electing to apply the de minimis safe harbor under this paragraph (f) may not capitalize under §1.263(a)-2(d)(1)" 

I hope that makes sense. Always open for your interpretation. Let me know.  thanks 

Rotate Log in or sign up to reply
user profile avatar
Check Rosette Top Subjects:
Team, Traditional Financing, and Real Estate Finance
  • Posts 3.1K
  • Votes 3.7K

Natalie Kolodij (Moderator) -
Accountant from Charlotte, NC

replied over 3 years ago

I have to agree with Linda. 

I think what it comes down to is more the intent of the property for business use. If it wasn't ready to be used yet to generate income (which it wasn't since you were making renovations to make it rent able) then it is not technically in service yet. So you can't deduct expenses since it's not yet an operational business. 

@Steven Hamilton II How do you interpret the reg provided above? 

Rotate Log in or sign up to reply
user profile avatar
Check Rosette Top Subjects:
Tenants, Rentals, and Traditional Financing
  • Posts 2.2K
  • Votes 2.0K

Ashish Acharya
Accountant, CPA, CFP®, PFS from Atlanta, GA

replied over 3 years ago
Originally posted by @Natalie Kolodij :

I have to agree with Linda. 

I think what it comes down to is more the intent of the property for business use. If it wasn't ready to be used yet to generate income (which it wasn't since you were making renovations to make it rent able) then it is not technically in service yet. So you can't deduct expenses since it's not yet an operational business. 

@Steven Hamilton II How do you interpret the reg provided above? 

 I think he bought the property to rent. The capitalization rules kick in as soon as he purchases it. On the pre- rental expenses for his rental property, please see if you agree with what I wrote above. 

Rotate Log in or sign up to reply
user profile avatar
  • Posts 1.7K
  • Votes 831

Dave Toelkes
Investor from Pawleys Island, South Carolina

replied over 3 years ago

@Ashish Acharya ,

Before Jan 1, 2016 when the newest de minimis safe harbor rules became effective, we had to make a subjective determinination whether each tangible property cost was a repair or an improvement.  For property already in service, the de minimis safe harbor at the time allowed us to expense some inexpensive tangible property improvements if the total cost was $500 or less.  All repairs needed to make a property ready and available for service were deemed to be improvements and had to be capitalized.   Let's call these pre-2016 rules the "general rules." 

Beginning with tax year 2016, new de minimis safe harbor rules increased the qualifying inexpensive tangible property improvement  cost from $500 to $2500 per invoice, or per item if several items on the invoice were itemized.  The rules also required us to make a retroactive election for the entire tax year if we wanted to use the new §1.263 safe harbor. That is, in 2017 when I prepared my 2016 tax returns, If I wanted to use the new de minimis safe harbor rules, I had to attach a statement to my tax return affirming the §1.263 election and submit it with my 2016 tax return.  

If I did not choose the new §1.263 de minimis safe harbor election,  the old general rules applied.  If I did choose the election , then I had to expense every inexpensive tangible property improvement that qualified.  I did not have the option to choose expensing some small cost improvements and capitalizing others.  

Just how I see it.

Rotate Log in or sign up to reply
user profile avatar
Check Rosette Top Subjects:
Tenants, Rentals, and Traditional Financing
  • Posts 2.2K
  • Votes 2.0K

Ashish Acharya
Accountant, CPA, CFP®, PFS from Atlanta, GA

replied over 3 years ago
Originally posted by @Dave Toelkes :

@Ashish Acharya,

Before Jan 1, 2016 when the newest de minimis safe harbor rules became effective, we had to make a subjective determinination whether each tangible property cost was a repair or an improvement.  For property already in service, the de minimis safe harbor at the time allowed us to expense some inexpensive tangible property improvements if the total cost was $500 or less.  All repairs needed to make a property ready and available for service were deemed to be improvements and had to be capitalized.   Let's call these pre-2016 rules the "general rules." 

Beginning with tax year 2016, new de minimis safe harbor rules increased the qualifying inexpensive tangible property improvement  cost from $500 to $2500 per invoice, or per item if several items on the invoice were itemized.  The rules also required us to make a retroactive election for the entire tax year if we wanted to use the new §1.263 safe harbor. That is, in 2017 when I prepared my 2016 tax returns, If I wanted to use the new de minimis safe harbor rules, I had to attach a statement to my tax return affirming the §1.263 election and submit it with my 2016 tax return.  

If I did not choose the new §1.263 de minimis safe harbor election,  the old general rules applied.  If I did choose the election , then I had to expense every inexpensive tangible property improvement that qualified.  I did not have the option to choose expensing some small cost improvements and capitalizing others.  

Just how I see it.

Dave, you are referring to the property that is already placed in service and the de minimis election is valid in that situation. The question here was about the property that is bought and work done before placing the property in service. 

Rotate Log in or sign up to reply
user profile avatar
Check Rosette Top Subject:
Taxes & Accounting
  • Posts 2.6K
  • Votes 3.4K

Linda Weygant
Investor and CPA from Arvada, Colorado

replied over 3 years ago
Originally posted by @Ashish Acharya :
Originally posted by @Natalie Kolodij:

I have to agree with Linda. 

I think what it comes down to is more the intent of the property for business use. If it wasn't ready to be used yet to generate income (which it wasn't since you were making renovations to make it rent able) then it is not technically in service yet. So you can't deduct expenses since it's not yet an operational business. 

@Steven Hamilton II How do you interpret the reg provided above? 

 I think he bought the property to rent. The capitalization rules kick in as soon as he purchases it. On the pre- rental expenses for his rental property, please see if you agree with what I wrote above. 

No - don't agree in the slightest.  You may want to read up on basis calculations to prepare an asset for service.  If an asset is not ready for service, then costs to make it ready for service are capitalized.  This is one of those times where GAAP agrees with tax, so you can find this in most Intermediate Accounting textbooks.  Tax regulations don't go into it too much because they just tend to state "basis of asset" - the IRS doesn't get into telling you how to calculate basis too much, so you'll have to fall back on GAAP for that.

Rotate Log in or sign up to reply
user profile avatar
  • Posts 47
  • Votes 21

Chris Sullens
from Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

replied over 3 years ago

That's for the answers guys. As a non-CPA, what I'm taking away front this is: 1. I probably have to capitalize most of my expenses prior to making the house available to rent. I really wish I had known this upfront. That detail seems to escaped most my if reading about investing, most which leads one to believe that many expenses are immediacy deductible. 2. I need to find a CPA who really knows their stuff and is experienced with real estate investors!

Rotate Log in or sign up to reply
user profile avatar
Check Rosette Top Subjects:
Team, Traditional Financing, and Real Estate Finance
  • Posts 3.1K
  • Votes 3.7K

Natalie Kolodij (Moderator) -
Accountant from Charlotte, NC

replied over 3 years ago

@Chris Sullens  

@Linda Weygant has been in your corner providing excellent, accurate information throughout this post....I would give her a call if you're looking for a real estate CPA who knows their stuff :) 

Rotate Log in or sign up to reply
user profile avatar
  • Posts 47
  • Votes 21

Chris Sullens
from Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

replied over 3 years ago

@Natalie Kolodij , you know I really hadn't even considered that I might want to use a CPA who isn't local to me. That's something I guess I should consider. Thanks!

Rotate Log in or sign up to reply
user profile avatar
Check Rosette Top Subjects:
Tenants, Rentals, and Traditional Financing
  • Posts 2.2K
  • Votes 2.0K

Ashish Acharya
Accountant, CPA, CFP®, PFS from Atlanta, GA

replied over 3 years ago

@Linda Weygant We are on the same page on the calculation of the basis, but when the property is acquired to be placed in for the service, the question is can you still take the de minimis election to deduct some expenses as opposed to capitalizing it.

If you read what I cited above, it says you can. It's a Regulation. If you don't agree with the guidance I cited, may be you can look at this federal register that says the additional cost that can be elected under de minimis is the work performed before placing the property in service.

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2013/09/19/2013-21756/guidance-regarding-deduction-and-capitalization-of-expenditures-related-to-tangible-property

“The final regulations adopt the commenters' suggestions, in part, and clarify the treatment under the de minimis safe harbor of transaction costs and other additional costs of acquiring and producing property subject to the safe harbor…….The final regulations also clarify that additional costs consist of the transaction costs (that is, the facilitative costs under § 1.263(a)-2(f)) of acquiring or producing the property and the costs under § 1.263(a)-2(d) for work performed prior to the date that the unit of tangible property is placed in service.”


It says additional cost includes work performed prior to the date that the unit of tangible property is placed in service.

Rotate Log in or sign up to reply
user profile avatar
Check Rosette Top Subject:
Taxes & Accounting
  • Posts 2.6K
  • Votes 3.4K

Linda Weygant
Investor and CPA from Arvada, Colorado

replied over 3 years ago

Well that was a metric crapton of reading, but here are the nuggets I pulled out of it:  (Emphasis Mine as bold and underline)

In the link you provided, I could find nothing to back up your assertion, but found the following sections that back up mine.  Since what you linked contained almost 150 pages of information, I didn't read the whole thing word for word.  Instead, I did a couple of searches for key words and phrases (such as "prior to" and "in service" and "de minimus" and the below is what I found.

Please copy/paste the relevant sections that support a taxpayer's ability to claim a de minimus deduction for assets BEFORE they are placed into service.  I certainly couldn't find anything.  If it's true, then it's awesome and will make lots of people happy, but it would fly in the face of most other IRS Tax Code and conventions.

Example 10.

Work performed prior to placing the property in service. In Year 1, M purchases a building for use as a business office. Prior to placing the building in service, M pays amounts to repair cement steps, refinish wood floors, patch holes in walls, and paint the interiors and exteriors of the building. In Year 2, M places the building in service and begins using the building as its business office. Assume that the work that M performs does not constitute an improvement to the building or its structural components under § 1.263(a)-3. Under § 1.263-3(e)(2)(i), the building and its structural components is a single unit of property. Under paragraph (d)(1) of this section, the amounts paid must be capitalized as amounts to acquire the building unit of property because they were for work performed prior to M's placing the building in service.

Example 11.

Work performed prior to placing the property in service. In January Year 1, N purchases a new machine for use in an existing production line of its manufacturing business. Assume that the machine is a unit of property under § 1.263(a)-3(e) and is not a material or supply under § 1.162-3. N pays amounts to install the machine, and after the machine is installed, N pays amounts to perform a critical test on the machine to ensure that it will operate in accordance with quality standards. On November 1, Year 1, the critical test is complete, and N places the machine in service on the production line. N pays amounts to perform periodic quality control testing after the machine is placed in service. Under paragraph (d)(1) of this section, the amounts paid for the installation and the critical test performed before the machine is placed in service must be capitalized by N as amounts to acquire the machine. However, amounts paid for periodic quality control testing after N placed the machine in service are not required to be capitalized as amounts paid to acquire the machine.

V. Amounts Paid To Acquire or Produce Tangible Property Under § 1.263(a)-2

Section 1.263(a)-2T of the 2011 temporary regulations provided rules for applying section 263(a) to amounts paid to acquire or produce a unit of real or personal property. In general, the final regulations retain the rules from the 2011 temporary regulations, including general requirements to capitalize amounts paid to acquire or produce a unit of real or personal property...

Rotate Log in or sign up to reply
user profile avatar
  • Posts 25
  • Votes 1

Jake Moran
Rental Property Investor from Falls Church, VA

replied 8 months ago
Originally posted by @Linda Weygant :

Well that was a metric crapton of reading, but here are the nuggets I pulled out of it:  (Emphasis Mine as bold and underline)

In the link you provided, I could find nothing to back up your assertion, but found the following sections that back up mine.  Since what you linked contained almost 150 pages of information, I didn't read the whole thing word for word.  Instead, I did a couple of searches for key words and phrases (such as "prior to" and "in service" and "de minimus" and the below is what I found.

Please copy/paste the relevant sections that support a taxpayer's ability to claim a de minimus deduction for assets BEFORE they are placed into service.  I certainly couldn't find anything.  If it's true, then it's awesome and will make lots of people happy, but it would fly in the face of most other IRS Tax Code and conventions.

Example 10.

Work performed prior to placing the property in service. In Year 1, M purchases a building for use as a business office. Prior to placing the building in service, M pays amounts to repair cement steps, refinish wood floors, patch holes in walls, and paint the interiors and exteriors of the building. In Year 2, M places the building in service and begins using the building as its business office. Assume that the work that M performs does not constitute an improvement to the building or its structural components under § 1.263(a)-3. Under § 1.263-3(e)(2)(i), the building and its structural components is a single unit of property. Under paragraph (d)(1) of this section, the amounts paid must be capitalized as amounts to acquire the building unit of property because they were for work performed prior to M's placing the building in service.

Example 11.

Work performed prior to placing the property in service. In January Year 1, N purchases a new machine for use in an existing production line of its manufacturing business. Assume that the machine is a unit of property under § 1.263(a)-3(e) and is not a material or supply under § 1.162-3. N pays amounts to install the machine, and after the machine is installed, N pays amounts to perform a critical test on the machine to ensure that it will operate in accordance with quality standards. On November 1, Year 1, the critical test is complete, and N places the machine in service on the production line. N pays amounts to perform periodic quality control testing after the machine is placed in service. Under paragraph (d)(1) of this section, the amounts paid for the installation and the critical test performed before the machine is placed in service must be capitalized by N as amounts to acquire the machine. However, amounts paid for periodic quality control testing after N placed the machine in service are not required to be capitalized as amounts paid to acquire the machine.

V. Amounts Paid To Acquire or Produce Tangible Property Under § 1.263(a)-2

Section 1.263(a)-2T of the 2011 temporary regulations provided rules for applying section 263(a) to amounts paid to acquire or produce a unit of real or personal property. In general, the final regulations retain the rules from the 2011 temporary regulations, including general requirements to capitalize amounts paid to acquire or produce a unit of real or personal property...

 
Linda, I'm a CPA though not specifically a tax accountant. You either didn't notice or chose to ignore the best point @Ashish made, which is that the rule and examples you are quoting in your argument don't apply when you elect the de minimus safe harbor. Reg 1.263(a)-2 specifically says,

(d) Acquired or produced tangible property -

(1) Requirement to capitalize. Except as provided in § 1.162-3 (relating to materials and supplies) and in § 1.263(a)-1(f) (providing a de minimis safe harbor election), a taxpayer must capitalize amounts paid to acquire or produce a unit of real or personal property

Then it goes on to list your previously mentioned Examples 10 and 11.... the logic is pretty obvious that the de minimis exception supersedes the requirements in those examples.

How can you argue against that?

Rotate Log in or sign up to reply
user profile avatar
Check Rosette Top Subject:
Taxes & Accounting
  • Posts 2.6K
  • Votes 3.4K

Linda Weygant
Investor and CPA from Arvada, Colorado

replied 8 months ago
Originally posted by @Jake Moran :
Originally posted by @Linda Weygant:

Well that was a metric crapton of reading, but here are the nuggets I pulled out of it:  (Emphasis Mine as bold and underline)

In the link you provided, I could find nothing to back up your assertion, but found the following sections that back up mine.  Since what you linked contained almost 150 pages of information, I didn't read the whole thing word for word.  Instead, I did a couple of searches for key words and phrases (such as "prior to" and "in service" and "de minimus" and the below is what I found.

Please copy/paste the relevant sections that support a taxpayer's ability to claim a de minimus deduction for assets BEFORE they are placed into service.  I certainly couldn't find anything.  If it's true, then it's awesome and will make lots of people happy, but it would fly in the face of most other IRS Tax Code and conventions.

Example 10.

Work performed prior to placing the property in service. In Year 1, M purchases a building for use as a business office. Prior to placing the building in service, M pays amounts to repair cement steps, refinish wood floors, patch holes in walls, and paint the interiors and exteriors of the building. In Year 2, M places the building in service and begins using the building as its business office. Assume that the work that M performs does not constitute an improvement to the building or its structural components under § 1.263(a)-3. Under § 1.263-3(e)(2)(i), the building and its structural components is a single unit of property. Under paragraph (d)(1) of this section, the amounts paid must be capitalized as amounts to acquire the building unit of property because they were for work performed prior to M's placing the building in service.

Example 11.

Work performed prior to placing the property in service. In January Year 1, N purchases a new machine for use in an existing production line of its manufacturing business. Assume that the machine is a unit of property under § 1.263(a)-3(e) and is not a material or supply under § 1.162-3. N pays amounts to install the machine, and after the machine is installed, N pays amounts to perform a critical test on the machine to ensure that it will operate in accordance with quality standards. On November 1, Year 1, the critical test is complete, and N places the machine in service on the production line. N pays amounts to perform periodic quality control testing after the machine is placed in service. Under paragraph (d)(1) of this section, the amounts paid for the installation and the critical test performed before the machine is placed in service must be capitalized by N as amounts to acquire the machine. However, amounts paid for periodic quality control testing after N placed the machine in service are not required to be capitalized as amounts paid to acquire the machine.

V. Amounts Paid To Acquire or Produce Tangible Property Under § 1.263(a)-2

Section 1.263(a)-2T of the 2011 temporary regulations provided rules for applying section 263(a) to amounts paid to acquire or produce a unit of real or personal property. In general, the final regulations retain the rules from the 2011 temporary regulations, including general requirements to capitalize amounts paid to acquire or produce a unit of real or personal property...

 
Linda, I'm a CPA though not specifically a tax accountant. You either didn't notice or chose to ignore the best point @Ashish made, which is that the rule and examples you are quoting in your argument don't apply when you elect the de minimus safe harbor. Reg 1.263(a)-2 specifically says,

(d) Acquired or produced tangible property -

(1) Requirement to capitalize. Except as provided in § 1.162-3 (relating to materials and supplies) and in § 1.263(a)-1(f) (providing a de minimis safe harbor election), a taxpayer must capitalize amounts paid to acquire or produce a unit of real or personal property

Then it goes on to list your previously mentioned Examples 10 and 11.... the logic is pretty obvious that the de minimis exception supersedes the requirements in those examples.

How can you argue against that?

 Because DeMinimis Safe Harbor applies to repairs/improvements made AFTER the property is placed in service.  The discussion above (from three years ago - nice zombie thread - is regarding expenses incurred prior to the property placed in service.

Rotate Log in or sign up to reply
user profile avatar
  • Posts 25
  • Votes 1

Jake Moran
Rental Property Investor from Falls Church, VA

replied 8 months ago
Originally posted by @Linda Weygant :

 Because DeMinimis Safe Harbor applies to repairs/improvements made AFTER the property is placed in service.  The discussion above (from three years ago - nice zombie thread - is regarding expenses incurred prior to the property placed in service.

Where is there language that says the de minimis only applies to items AFTER placed in service?

Rotate Log in or sign up to reply
user profile avatar
Check Rosette Top Subjects:
Team, Traditional Financing, and Real Estate Finance
  • Posts 3.1K
  • Votes 3.7K

Natalie Kolodij (Moderator) -
Accountant from Charlotte, NC

replied 8 months ago
Originally posted by @Jake Moran :
Originally posted by @Linda Weygant:

 Because DeMinimis Safe Harbor applies to repairs/improvements made AFTER the property is placed in service.  The discussion above (from three years ago - nice zombie thread - is regarding expenses incurred prior to the property placed in service.

Where is there language that says the de minimis only applies to items AFTER placed in service?

It related to the tax code treatment of an asset. 

The IRS considers an assets cost ALL costs incurred to make it do it's job. 

If you buy a machine for a warehouse you include the purchase, delivery, programming, ect costs. ALL in the cost. 

Same with a rental- all costs needed to make it ready for it's use are part of the cost. 

https://www.irs.gov/publications/p551

The deminimus pertains to a business costs but the business isn't open/ asset isn't in service with a rental until it's ready and available. 


 

Rotate Log in or sign up to reply
user profile avatar
Check Rosette Top Subjects:
Team, Analyze Deals, and Taxes & Accounting
  • Posts 5.2K
  • Votes 2.2K

Steven Hamilton II
Accountant, Enrolled Agent from Grayslake, IL

replied 8 months ago

Natalie is entirely correct.

Rotate Log in or sign up to reply
user profile avatar
Check Rosette Top Subjects:
Team, Traditional Financing, and Real Estate Finance
  • Posts 3.1K
  • Votes 3.7K

Natalie Kolodij (Moderator) -
Accountant from Charlotte, NC

replied 8 months ago

@Ashish Acharya Since your thread got resurrected from 3 years ago. 

Do you still hold to the opinion that you can utilize the deminimus safe harbor BEFORE an asset is in service? 


Rotate Log in or sign up to reply
user profile avatar
Check Rosette Top Subject:
Taxes & Accounting
  • Posts 2.6K
  • Votes 3.4K

Linda Weygant
Investor and CPA from Arvada, Colorado

replied 8 months ago
Originally posted by @Jake Moran :
Originally posted by @Linda Weygant:

 Because DeMinimis Safe Harbor applies to repairs/improvements made AFTER the property is placed in service.  The discussion above (from three years ago - nice zombie thread - is regarding expenses incurred prior to the property placed in service.

Where is there language that says the de minimis only applies to items AFTER placed in service?

 Everything related to my position on this was already said above.  Nothing has changed.  

Rotate Log in or sign up to reply
  • 1
  • 2
Related Resources Tax, Legal Issues, Contracts, Self-Directed IRA
21 Real Estate Professionals You Need on Your Team (Updated 2021)
Do You Need a Real Estate Partner?
Selling Your LLC? Make Sure You Transfer Your Ownership Interest Correctly
How to Protect Your Property With Landlord Insurance
Customer Relationship Management: The Holy Grail of Business Success
Resources Read, see, and learn more!
Link Real Estate Investment Calculators
Link BiggerPockets Blog
Link Path to Purchase
Link Mortgage Loans
Link Find a Contractor
Link Real Estate Agents
Link Hard Money Lenders
Link Real Estate Listings

Top Contributors

Ashish Acharya
Ashish Acharya
Atlanta, GA
9.64
Score
Michael Plaks
Michael Plaks
Houston, TX
4.47
Score
Dmitriy Fomichenko
Dmitriy Fomichenko
Anaheim Hills, CA
3.56
Score
Veronica Ivy
Veronica Ivy
Charlotte, NC
1.99
Score
Jay Hinrichs
Jay Hinrichs
Lake Oswego OR Summerlin, NV
1.7
Score

Tax, Legal Issues, Contracts, Self-Directed IRA Trending Discussions

  • Property Tax Not Paid from Prev. Owner and my Home in Foreclosure
    21 Replies
  • Property Tax Protest Recommendation - Austin & San Antonio Area
    2 Replies
  • 1031 Exchange - DST?
    29 Replies
  • 1031 exchange with LLCs involved
    2 Replies
  • Prior Year (2020) HSA Contributions after Filling Taxes in 2021
    3 Replies
Log in Sign up

Log in

Forgot password?

If you signed up for BiggerPockets via Facebook, you can log in with just one click!

Log in with Facebook

Or
btn_google_dark_normal_ios Created with Sketch. Continue with Google

Let's get started

We just need a few details to get you set up and ready to go!

Use your real name

Use at least 8 characters. Using a phrase of random words (like: paper Dog team blue) is secure and easy to remember.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.

Or
btn_google_dark_normal_ios Created with Sketch. Continue with Google

Why create an account?

Receive a free digital download of The Ultimate Beginner's Guide to Real Estate Investing.

Connect with 1,000,000+ real estate investors!

Find local real estate meetups and events in your area.

Start analyzing real estate properties, we do the math for you.

It's free!

Explore

  • Membership
  • Community
  • Education
  • Marketplace
  • Tools
  • FilePlace
  • REI Resources
  • Perks
  • Glossary
  • Reviews
  • iOS App
  • Android App

Company

  • About Us
  • Press
  • Advertising
  • Careers
  • Stats
  • Contact Us

Important

  • Editorial Guidelines
  • Terms of Use
  • Rules
  • Privacy
  • FAQ

Social

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
© 2004-2021 BiggerPockets, LLC. All Rights Reserved.