Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 7 years ago on . Most recent reply presented by

User Stats

61
Posts
22
Votes
Rick S.
  • Investor
  • Oceanside, CA
22
Votes |
61
Posts

Do Co-owners Have to Deduct Expenses 50/50?

Rick S.
  • Investor
  • Oceanside, CA
Posted

A partner and I own a rental SFR as Joint Tennants with 50% ownership each. In the past we have split all income and expenses evenly and claimed them 50/50 on each years tax returns. We sold the property in 2017 and split the proceeds 50/50. However, my partner paid $20k more in selling expenses than I did. Can she claim more than her 50% share of selling expenses on her 2017 tax return, or must we each claim 50% regardless of who actually paid for it?

I found this excerpt in IRS Pub 527, but it refers to rental expenses, and not sales expenses...

Part interest.

If you own a part interest in rental property, you can deduct expenses you paid according to your percentage of ownership.

Example.

Roger owns a one-half undivided interest in a rental house. Last year he paid $968 for necessary repairs on the property. Roger can deduct $484 (50% × $968) as a rental expense. He is entitled to reimbursement for the remaining half from the co-owner.

It sounds like the IRS forces income and expenses to be divided according to ownership percentages, but since I am not a tax expert, I thought I would ask a CPA here on BP. Thank you for any help.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

5,221
Posts
6,145
Votes
Michael Plaks
#1 Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation Contributor
  • Tax Accountant / Enrolled Agent
  • Houston, TX
6,145
Votes |
5,221
Posts
Michael Plaks
#1 Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation Contributor
  • Tax Accountant / Enrolled Agent
  • Houston, TX
Replied

@Rick S.

Full discussion of various issues in your situation could be really long, and it's best addressed in a private consultation with a tax expert. I will give you something to start from, but it's not a complete answer. 

Based on your description, I assume that you were not filing a partnership return for the property. Probably you were each reporting 50% of rent income and 50% of expenses, and hopefully you were actually splitting income and expenses 50/50. (If not - then it's a major mess, best left for professionals to untangle.)

Under this scenario, here is how you should have handled the sale:

  1. From the sale proceeds, reimburse each other for your respective contributions to the closing costs.
  2. Whatever is left - split 50/50.
  3. For taxes, each of you will report half of the sales proceeds, adjusted for the combined closing costs.

If you can go back and do it this way - your economic parity will be intact, and so will be your tax reporting. If it's too late to adjust - then, again, you will have what I will label a mess. Not just for taxes, but for basic fairness. It's possible to compensate for on taxes (not economically, though), but it requires a tax professional.

Additional complications will arise if the sale was reported by your tittle company 100% under one of your SSNs, as opposed to 50/50. I bet that this IS how it was reported. The IRS will think that one of you received 100% of the proceeds, while you actually received 50% each. Once again, a problem that can be addressed by a tax professional who knows real estate.

  • Michael Plaks
  • Loading replies...