Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 6 years ago on . Most recent reply presented by

User Stats

52
Posts
76
Votes
Alexander V.
  • United States
76
Votes |
52
Posts

Legally creating new "units" vs. leasing rooms ad hoc

Alexander V.
  • United States
Posted

A SFH is different from a duplex, which is different from a triplex and 4plex, which are all totally different from 5+ units. But legally speaking, what makes something a "unit" in the view of the city planners as opposed to an ad hoc division on the property? For example, my cousin in college rented a single room in a 4 bedroom house. It was a SFH, but it had 4 different people renting 4 different rooms. I've heard of this particularly in college towns and in areas like SF where costs are extremely high. Is there any legal barrier to leasing subdivided spaces in a large house on an ad hoc basis as opposed to partitioning them off as "units" with individual meters and entrances?

I'm just trying to wrap my head around zoning laws. It seems like a case of unnecessary complication--if you lease out 3 separate rooms, it's fine. If you label them as "units" and add separate meters, suddenly you have a billion legal papers to file, city officials to navigate, and rezoning fees to pay.

Loading replies...