Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 8 years ago on . Most recent reply presented by

User Stats

16
Posts
5
Votes
Mack Fleming
  • Brewton, AL
5
Votes |
16
Posts

Real Estate "Dealers", Installment Sales, Deferred Taxes, and the IRS

Mack Fleming
  • Brewton, AL
Posted

The IRS does not allow real property Dealers to use the Installment Plan method of accounting. This means that if the Dealer does an Owner Financed sell, he/she is responsible for the tax liability for the entire paper profit, all due in the tax year of sale. This is not fair.

One of the only exceptions I have found is: (1) The Dealer is engaged in selling unimproved residential lots. (2) He/she must pay a special tax on the deferred tax liability. Again, the Dealer is responsible for the tax liability for entire paper profit. The only difference here is if it is not paid to the IRS in the tax year of sale, then interest must be paid to the IRS on the amount of the tax liability. This is not fair.

Assuming I am correct in my understanding, I would like to know what others think of this.

Thank you,
Mack

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

3,563
Posts
2,685
Votes
David Krulac
  • Mechanicsburg, PA
2,685
Votes |
3,563
Posts
David Krulac
  • Mechanicsburg, PA
Replied

Mack Fleming

Fair or not fair, that is not the question, whether tis nobler....

The dealer status question has been around a long long time. Some of the cases go back to the 1950s, and 1960s. I've been to the mat on this issue, so I'm very familar. It was be easy for the IRS to clarify this issue, but they have never seen fit to do so. There are cases where selling only 1 property has been court ratified as being a dealer and other court cases where selling 100 proeprties has not made the taxpayer a dealer.

A simple number would probably be a great thing. "5 sales in 1 year not a dealer, 6 sales in 1 year you are a dealer" but that is NOT happening soon or in our lifetimes.

Being a dealer is also a bad thing in that:

1. You can NOT do a 1031 tax free exchange.
2. You can NOT depreciate property.
3. You can NOT take long term capital gains.
4. You can NOT take favorable installment sales treatment.

Seperation by entities does NOT always work either. In an audit, they will look for reasons to blend your activities. Like do you have seperate bank accounts for each entitites? Do you have seperate EIN? Do you have seperate books, corporate minutes? Do you ever co-mingle funds? etc. etc. etc. There are if I remember correctly 8 criteria, any 1 can upset the apple cart. Are you under capitalized in any entity?
Ask me how I know this stuff?

Bottom line, in the eye of the tax man, you should sell the entire property in one sale. Once you have mutiple sales, you are a developer, a subdivider, and a dealer.

Loading replies...