Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 4 years ago on . Most recent reply presented by

User Stats

133
Posts
35
Votes
Chad C.
  • Denham Springs, LA
35
Votes |
133
Posts

When would long term gains be taxed as self employment income?

Chad C.
  • Denham Springs, LA
Posted

I currently work full time, and I have 10 properties that I have installment sales on, and they will be taxed using long term gains. I got the impression from my CPA that if I was to reduce my employed hours enough(or quit), that the installment sales would be taxed at self employment income rates. I asked where the line was, and he said I need about 60% full time employed to use long term gains? Any input or clarification?  Is this just following the 50% rule of real estate professional status guidelines?

I am trying to figure out if I can reduce my employed hours, keep my income low, less than 40ishk and get in 0% capital gains bracket. Or make 60-80k in rental income (from other regular rental properties)and depreciate enough to show less than 40k. Then pay 0% tax on those 10 properties.

I have been trying to figure out how to obtain REP status to pas losses on, but maybe I want to avoid it so I don’t have to pay self employment tax. it seems that there may be a sweet spot, or efficiency spot, while I transfer to full REP status.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

4,241
Posts
3,333
Votes
Ashish Acharya
#2 Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation Contributor
  • CPA, CFP®, PFS
  • Florida
3,333
Votes |
4,241
Posts
Ashish Acharya
#2 Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation Contributor
  • CPA, CFP®, PFS
  • Florida
Replied
Originally posted by @Chad C.:

I currently work full time, and I have 10 properties that I have installment sales on, and they will be taxed using long term gains. I got the impression from my CPA that if I was to reduce my employed hours enough(or quit), that the installment sales would be taxed at self employment income rates. I asked where the line was, and he said I need about 60% full time employed to use long term gains? Any input or clarification?  Is this just following the 50% rule of real estate professional status guidelines?

I am trying to figure out if I can reduce my employed hours, keep my income low, less than 40ishk and get in 0% capital gains bracket. Or make 60-80k in rental income (from other regular rental properties)and depreciate enough to show less than 40k. Then pay 0% tax on those 10 properties.

I have been trying to figure out how to obtain REP status to pas losses on, but maybe I want to avoid it so I don’t have to pay self employment tax. it seems that there may be a sweet spot, or efficiency spot, while I transfer to full REP status.

If the sale has already happened, they will never be self-employed income. 

Also, the self-employment income would never be reported as installment sale.

I think what your CPA might be saying is if you start selling new properties as flipper/dealer, you new income will be subject to SE taxes. 

business profile image
INVESTOR FRIENDLY CPA®
5.0 stars
217 Reviews

Loading replies...