Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Please log in or sign up for a free account to continue.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 4 years ago on . Most recent reply presented by

User Stats

15
Posts
10
Votes
Shriraj Shah
10
Votes |
15
Posts

Tax benefit comparison - direct purchase vs syndication

Shriraj Shah
Posted

I am trying to analyze whether to purchase an investment rental property in a SFH/MFH on a turnkey basis or via a real estate syndication. Can someone help understand pros and cons from the tax perspective for the same?

I do understand that if I am buying and managing the property myself, all my direct expenses to manage the business are tax deductible, but since I'm thinking of investing on a turnkey basis and planning to hire a property manager for day to day operations, following would be tax deductible as a passive investor.

  • Mortgage Interest
  • Property Tax
  • Property Management Fee
  • Depreciation
  • Insurance
  • Possibility of 1031 exchange (Future)

When investing via a real estate syndication as a limited partner:

  • 20% of the pass through income from the LLC is tax-deductible

The Syndication LLC obviously would be taking the tax benefits of depreciation, property tax, mortgage interest deductions etc., but as a passive investor, is it more beneficial to invest directly in real estate than investing via a syndication? Is there a good tool to analyze both deals to figure out which would be more advantageous?

    Most Popular Reply

    User Stats

    843
    Posts
    1,015
    Votes
    Tony Kim
    • Rental Property Investor
    • Los Angeles
    1,015
    Votes |
    843
    Posts
    Tony Kim
    • Rental Property Investor
    • Los Angeles
    Replied
    Originally posted by @Shriraj Shah:

    I am trying to analyze whether to purchase an investment rental property in a SFH/MFH on a turnkey basis or via a real estate syndication. Can someone help understand pros and cons from the tax perspective for the same?

    I do understand that if I am buying and managing the property myself, all my direct expenses to manage the business are tax deductible, but since I'm thinking of investing on a turnkey basis and planning to hire a property manager for day to day operations, following would be tax deductible as a passive investor.

    • Mortgage Interest
    • Property Tax
    • Property Management Fee
    • Depreciation
    • Insurance
    • Possibility of 1031 exchange (Future)

    When investing via a real estate syndication as a limited partner:

    • 20% of the pass through income from the LLC is tax-deductible

    The Syndication LLC obviously would be taking the tax benefits of depreciation, property tax, mortgage interest deductions etc., but as a passive investor, is it more beneficial to invest directly in real estate than investing via a syndication? Is there a good tool to analyze both deals to figure out which would be more advantageous?

      Here are my initial thoughts on your post. Although tax is important in general, in my mind this consideration should be relatively low on the totem pole when deciding between TKs vs syndications. If you go with a proper TK operator, your passive income should be greater than zero starting from the first year. So whether or not you are passive or an active participant shouldn't really matter. Also, even if you do happen to have a passive loss your first year, it should be very minor. IMO, it's not much of a consideration because all expenses are subject to the same rules of deduction regardless of whether you are an active participant or not. The only difference is whether or not you'd be able to offset against your ordinary income...and that's also assuming your income level is under a certain amount (my apologies if I'm pointing out something you already know).

      As for syndications, as long as we are talking about equity purchases of commercial property and not debt or some of the other fancy syndications out there like secondary market litigation or insurance, you will have very large passive losses starting from your first year. But again, as a non-active participant, you will have to carry these PALs forward and offset them against future passive income and not your ordinary income.

      Loading replies...