Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$39.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

User Stats

887
Posts
1,077
Votes
Greg R.
  • Investor
  • Dallas, TX
1,077
Votes |
887
Posts

Dispute between tenants regarding security deposit

Greg R.
  • Investor
  • Dallas, TX
Posted

Hello BP,

I am no longer managing this building as I passed it off to a PM. However, I became aware of a situation the other day and I'd like to get your take on it. The situation is that two friends rented the unit, both of their names were on the lease as joint occupants. About 6 months ago they had a falling out and roommate A moved out. Roommate B stayed and occupied the property for another 8 months .Tenant B took care of the place, made rent payments on time every month, etc. 

Roommate B is now moving out, and roommate A caught wind of it. Roommate A is saying that she paid a third of the security deposit and is demanding that it's returned to her. Roomate B is saying that she paid all of the deposit. They are both calling each other a liar. 

The PM company is saying that they don't get involved in these kinds of disputes, which I totally support. They say that (as normal) the deposit stays in a brokerage trust until all tenants move out. They say that in this situatiuon the full deposit will go to the last person to occupy the property, and it's up to that person to pay out the roommate who left prior. 

Is this standard practice? This is the first time I've personally come across this situation. 

Thanks.


Loading replies...