Newsom reduces deposits on Furnished apartments of first, last & security to just 1mo

[Jonn Vidal]

In many states, the last month's rent is or at least was an addendum to "security deposit" so much so that most renters no matter the state will tend to still ask to apply their remaining amount on deposit (last month deposit, NOT security deposit portion) to their 'last month' - yet CA landlords are now well as of since July 2023 going forward, prohibited from applying ANY deposit to the unpaid last month, thus Newsom is giving all tenants who don't care about their credit a FREE LAST MONTH EVERY TIME THEY MOVE OUT if they make the case that their security deposit cannot lawfully be applied to the last month of rent in arrears?!.

Furthermore, now even lavishly furnished apartments, thanks to Newsom, will be limited to being secured only with a SINGLE month of security deposit in CA which CANNOT be applied to 'normal wear and tear' of furniture either, so if the tenant in a furnished apartment never pays their last month of rent but wears and tears down all the furnishings, it seems landlord would still have to give back the 'security' deposit on move-out, not being able to apply the 'security' deposit to last month of rent in arrears NOR the worn and torn furnishings?!

There goes the neighborhood.. and furniture, likely!

[Jason Wray]

Anything Newsom related seems like a badly produced reality show in CA......