Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

3
Posts
1
Votes
Justin Mancherje
  • Lafayette, CA
1
Votes |
3
Posts

Month-to-month tenants in Oakland, CA triplex

Justin Mancherje
  • Lafayette, CA
Posted

Currently there are two units occupied both paying well below market value in rent. The rental contracts are stated as month-to-month.

The lease has the phrasing : " the term of this agreement is for Month-to-Month, beginning on (beginning of the month) and ending on (end of the month) , at which time tis lease shall terminate without further notice. Any holding over thereafter shall result in Resident being liable to Owner/Agent for daily rental damages equal to the current market value of the unit, divided by 30. A "Month-to-month" tenancy subject to the terms and conditions of this agreement shall be created only if Owner/Agent accepts rent from the Resident thereafter, and if so accepted, tenancy may be terminated by Resident after service upon the Owner/Agent of a written 30-day Notice of Termination. Except as prohibited by law, that month-to-month tenancy may be terminated by the Owner/Agent by service upon the Resident of a written 60-day notice of termination of tenancy. However, Civil code section 1946.1 provides that "if any tenant or resident has resided in the dwelling for less than a year", the Owner/Agent may terminate the tenancy by service upon the Resident of a written 30-day notice"

Do month-to-month tenants have the same protection as tenants with a regular lease? It appears to say that the Onwer/Agent can terminate the lease agreement with 60 days notice, however that is following "except as prohibited by law". 

Is it possible to terminate the lease agreement with appropriate notice? and if not, how does a month-to-month agreement differ at all from a year lease?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

17
Posts
6
Votes
Chris Jones
  • San Jose, CA
6
Votes |
17
Posts
Chris Jones
  • San Jose, CA
Replied

The key here is, what does the Oakland rent control / just cause ordinance permit you to do? You cannot evict the tenant without just cause, regardless of what is in the lease, even if you give plenty of notice. You have to have a valid reason to evict (non-payment of rent, etc.) Make sure you read up on Oakland's rent control / just cause ordinances before you do anything. If you have detailed questions, I'd suggest reaching out to an attorney at Fried & Williams LLP. They have an office in Oakland, and they primarily handle landlord/tenant disputes representing landlords.

Loading replies...