Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

30
Posts
7
Votes
Ian S.
  • Investor
  • Geographically Confused
7
Votes |
30
Posts

Should I get a virtual mailbox for my non-LLC rentals?

Ian S.
  • Investor
  • Geographically Confused
Posted

Hi, since I live in California, an LLC is not a viable option for me for my out of state rentals (9 of them, mostly B/C). They are all managed by a property manager. It bothers me however that for my tenants it is so easy to find out who I am and where I live with one simple click on a real estate listing to get the property tax records. I was considering setting up a virtual mailbox (travelingmailbox.com maybe) to at least hide where I live, even though my name would be there. I realize that it would be far from bulletproof, but is it worth $15 a month just to make it a little more difficult to find out who I am (how much my own home is worth, etc.) and dissuade frivolous lawsuits (or creepy tenants).

Thanks!

  • Ian S.
  • Loading replies...