Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

11
Posts
5
Votes
Cameron Sylvester
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Saint Petersburg
5
Votes |
11
Posts

1 100k rental or 2 homes on the same property for 200k

Cameron Sylvester
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Saint Petersburg
Posted

Is it better to have 1 100,000 dollar rental or 2 homes on the same lot not a duplex for 200,000 dollars?

I am looking to buy a rental before the end of the year and am trying to decide if I should go after a single family home for around 100K (115- 95) (known as property "A" or get a single family home that has two units on it home with a carriage house around 200k (190 - 215( known as property "B").

The "A" home would get around 1000 a month in rent and the "B" would get about 1800 together in rent.

The "A" home is in a little worse area but is growing in popularity. The "B" home is in a good part of town but not a ton of growth. Taxes would be a little higher with "B". 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,460
Posts
1,596
Votes
Cassi Justiz
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Edmond, OK
1,596
Votes |
1,460
Posts
Cassi Justiz
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Edmond, OK
Replied

I would stick with one home for 100,000. Less potential for drama and you still have an extra 100,000 to do it again. BUT only if you can get a solid tenant pool in the area of property "A". If it's still hard to find reputable tenants to rent out the property because it's in a bad area, then it's going to be a risk tolerance question.

A potential upside would be that A home could increase rent/value if the area continues to gain popularity and desirability. 

Loading replies...