Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 6 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

99
Posts
158
Votes
Robert M.
  • Investor
  • Dundee, OR
158
Votes |
99
Posts

Oregon, first state wide rent control

Robert M.
  • Investor
  • Dundee, OR
Posted

Well, its a done deal. Oregon just sent an ominous message to real estate investors. We are now the first state to incorporate mandatory statewide rent control with relocation fee's.

What do you think this will do to the market and why?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

146
Posts
109
Votes
Gretchen P.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Littleton, CO
109
Votes |
146
Posts
Gretchen P.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Littleton, CO
Replied

I think it will be interesting to see how this plays out. I looked up the one year increase in 2017 in Seattle and Portland, one was 3% and one was 4%. The newly allowed 7% plus inflation (2018 was 1.9%) is higher than rent has risen over the past year. 

As a landlord in I currently haven't raised the rent on good tenants for the first renew, and if I do after the second it isn't for 7% year. Turnover is more expensive than the extra money from a rent increase. However, if I was in OR I would automatically raise the max allowable per year. I wouldn't want to get stuck after 4 years with the same tenant and modest increases without the option to raise to market rent for a new tenant, especially after incurring make-ready costs and vacancy associated with finding a great tenant. In my mind year over year of 7% increases (without inflation added) is hefty, $105 per year on $1500 rent. I'm guessing rents end up skyrocketing over time in OR, historically rents have risen about 4% nationally. Landlords have a good anchor for raising the max allowable - it is allowed by law. I'm not sure this law will help tenants keep rents low. Eviction seems like a thornier issue for landlords with the new regulations. 

Loading replies...

1 2