Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 6 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

15
Posts
3
Votes
Lettie T.
  • Kansas
3
Votes |
15
Posts

Pets are considered occupants

Lettie T.
  • Kansas
Posted

A local property management company limits occupancy to "2 heartbeats per bedroom." Their definition of heartbeat is literally anything with a heartbeat, so people AND pets. I've never seen anything like this before and thought it was an interesting concept. I can see how this could ensure compliance with our local occupancy laws, prevent parking issues, and maybe even discourage large fish tanks (fish have heartbeats too! :-).

I've just started shopping for my first rental property. And as I set up my own approval criteria and policies, I would love to hear what experienced landlords think of this use of the word heartbeat, as opposed to saying people or occupants. What could be the downside? Is anyone else using similar language?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

18
Posts
16
Votes
Lauren Do
  • Specialist
16
Votes |
18
Posts
Lauren Do
  • Specialist
Replied

I can only imagine what would happen if someone tried to enforce something like this on a couple who was pregnant. 

Loading replies...