Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 6 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

467
Posts
161
Votes
Matt Berklacy
  • Rental Property Investor | Realtor
  • Jacksonville FL | Savannah Ga |Raleigh NC
161
Votes |
467
Posts

lease w/ option to own, versus seller finance, ..better passive?

Matt Berklacy
  • Rental Property Investor | Realtor
  • Jacksonville FL | Savannah Ga |Raleigh NC
Posted

what works better all around for a passive income play, least stress, least legal issue? 

lease with option to own? (non refundable deposit, higher payments, outsource light repairs to tenant,)

or seller finance? large reasonable downpayment, higher sale price,,,hold note, 

why would you do one over the other?

im my opinion, both require forclosure, ...both can pass on some fix-up to new party

(in applying this to me, im holding existing properties, NC and Fl I want to exit out of best stretegy for passive income....and i do existing buys off market, want best duplicatable strategy, rather than flip)

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

3,059
Posts
1,286
Votes
Shawn Ackerman
  • Real Estate Entrepreneur
  • Mid West, East Coast
1,286
Votes |
3,059
Posts
Shawn Ackerman
  • Real Estate Entrepreneur
  • Mid West, East Coast
Replied

@Matt Berklacy This is a great subject and thank you for posting this.  I Prefer Lease options simply because if the payment slow or stop you can treat the tenant like a tenant and start the eviction process.  At-least in WI where I invest.  We put $2,000 deductibles into our agreements  for major capex and do no routine maintenance of the property.  no need for management although we do these at a distance.  You have a built in exit strategy and  you still get to maintain the 27.5 depreciation tax benefit. The icing on the cake is the option deposit.  Man, that makes these deals sweet!!

I've only been on the receiving side of a seller financing(title transfer) deal so holding a note would be new to me.  In my experience the buyer, since they are renting to someone(typically) does not exercise the same amount of care for the property as a lease option tenant would.  With that said, the deterioration of the unit(s) may occur much quicker.  You must foreclose in this case unless you can work out a quiet title situation(not always likely).  The benefit of course is  a larger down payment and the interest rate you are able to charge over time.  You lose the ability to depreciate the property in this scenario which I'm not a fan of. 

You are asking the right questions and I'm sure whichever route you go it would be great for you.  All the best.  Remember to persist and you will WIN!!!!!

  • Shawn Ackerman
  • Loading replies...