All
Members
Companies
Blog
Forums
Podcast
Webinars
    User Log in  /  Sign up
  • Forums
    Newest Posts Trending Discussions Followed Forums Real Estate News & Current Events General Landlording & Rental Properties Buying & Selling Real Estate Deal Analysis See All
  • Education

    Read

    BiggerPockets Blog BPInsights: Expert Analysis Coronavirus Content & Resources Guides Glossary Reviews Member Blogs

    Watch

    Webinars Video Library Financial Independence Blueprint Intro to Real Estate: Rentals

    Listen

    BiggerPockets Real Estate Podcast BiggerPockets Money Podcast BiggerPockets Business Podcast Real Estate Rookie Podcast Daily Podcast (Audio Blog)

    Topics

    Business Operations Finance Finding Deals Property Management Property Types Strategy
  • Network

    Recommended Vendors

    Real Estate Agents Mortgage Lenders Companies Hard Money Lenders Contractors Investment Companies

    Search

    Members Events Jobs
  • Tools

    Calculators

    Rental Property Fix and Flip BRRRR Rehab Estimator
    Wholesaling Mortgage Payment 70% Rule Airbnb

    Services

    BPInsights: Property Insights Tenant Screening Property Management Lease Agreement Packages

    New Feature

    BPInsights (beta)

    Quickly analyze a property address or ZIP Code to compare your rent in your neighborhood.

    Analyze a property
  • Find Deals
    Real Estate Listings Find Foreclosures External Link Ads, Jobs, and Other
  • Bookstore

    Real Estate Books

    Profit Like The Pros Bidding to Buy See all books

    Featured Book

    BiggerPockets Wealth Magazine book cover
    BiggerPockets Wealth Magazine

    Written by financial journalists and data scientists, get 60+ pages of newsworthy content, expert-driven advice, and data-backed research written in a clear way to help you navigate your tough investment decisions in an ever-changing financial climate! Subscribe today and get the Oct/Nov issue delivered to your door!

    Get the Magazine
  • Pricing
Log In Sign up
User
Quick search links
Podcast Hard Money Lenders Books Washington
ForumsArrowGeneral Landlording & Rental PropertiesArrowWisconsin - City Hid Condemned House Status Until After Purchase
  • Newest Posts
    • Newest Posts
    • Unanswered Discussions
  • Trending
    • Top Discussions
    • Trending Discussions
  • Browse Forums
Search Nova
Topic: 1031 Exchanges Topic: Akron Real Estate Forum Topic: Alabama Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum Topic: Alaska Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum Topic: Alberta Real Estate Forum Topic: Albuquerque Topic: Allentown Real Estate Forum Topic: Anchorage Real Estate Forum Topic: Ann Arbor Topic: Arizona Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum Topic: Arkansas Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum Topic: Arlington Real Estate Forum Topic: Asheville NC Real Estate Forum Topic: Ask About A Real Estate Company Topic: Athens Real Estate Forum Topic: Atlanta Real Estate Forum Topic: Aurora Real Estate Forum Topic: Aurora Real Estate Forum Topic: Austin Real Estate Forum Topic: Bakersfield Real Estate Forum Topic: Baltimore Real Estate Forum Topic: Bankers, Lenders, and Mortgage Brokers Topic: Baton Rouge Real Estate Forum Topic: Beaverton Real Estate Forum Topic: BiggerPockets Business Podcast Topic: BiggerPockets Exclusive PRO Area Topic: BiggerPockets Money Podcast Topic: BiggerPockets Real Estate Investing Summit Topic: BiggerPockets Summer Reading List Topic: BiggerPockets Webinar Discussion Forum Topic: Billings Real Estate Forum Topic: Birmingham Real Estate Forum Topic: Bismarck Real Estate Forum Topic: Boise Real Estate Forum Topic: Boston Real Estate Forum Topic: Bridgeport Real Estate Forum Topic: British Columbia Real Estate Forum Topic: BRRRR - Buy, Rehab, Rent, Refinance, Repeat Topic: Buying & Selling Real Estate Discussion Topic: California Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum Topic: Cambridge Real Estate Forum Topic: Canadian Real Estate Topic: Cape Cod Real Estate Forum Topic: Cape Coral Real Estate Forum Topic: Casper Real Estate Forum Topic: Cedar Rapids Real Estate Forum Topic: Chandler Real Estate Forum Topic: Charleston Real Estate Forum Topic: Charleston Real Estate Forum Topic: Charlotte Real Estate Forum Topic: Chattanooga Real Estate Forum Topic: Chesapeake Real Estate Forum Topic: Cheyenne Real Estate Forum Topic: Chicago Real Estate Forum Topic: Chittenden County Real Estate Forum Topic: Cincinnati Real Estate Forum Topic: Cleveland Real Estate Forum Topic: Coastal NC Real Estate Forum Topic: Colorado Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum Topic: Colorado Springs Real Estate Forum Topic: Columbia Real Estate Forum Topic: Columbia Real Estate Forum Topic: Columbus Real Estate Forum Topic: Columbus Real Estate Forum Topic: Commercial Real Estate Investing Forum Topic: Completed Deal Diaries Topic: Connecticut Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum Topic: Construction & Remodeling Diaries Topic: Contractors Topic: Conway Real Estate Forum Topic: Coronavirus Conversation Topic: Coronavirus Government Assistance Programs Topic: Creative Real Estate Financing Forum Topic: Currently Under Contract Topic: Dallas Real Estate Forum Topic: Davenport Real Estate Forum Topic: Dayton Real Estate Forum Topic: Delaware Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum Topic: Denver Real Estate Forum Topic: Des Moines Real Estate Forum Topic: Detroit Real Estate Forum Topic: Do it Yourself Topic: El Paso Real Estate Forum Topic: Eugene Real Estate Forum Topic: Evansville Real Estate Forum Topic: FAQ Forum Topic: Fargo Topic: Fayetteville Real Estate Forum Topic: First Time Home Buyer Topic: Florida Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum Topic: Foreigners Buying in the USA Topic: Fort Collins Real Estate Forum Topic: Fort Lauderdale Real Estate Forum Topic: Fort Smith Real Estate Forum Topic: Fort Wayne Real Estate Forum Topic: Fort Worth Real Estate Forum Topic: Fresno Real Estate Forum Topic: General Foreclosure & Pre-Foreclosure Forums Topic: General Landlording & Rental Properties Topic: General Real Estate Investing Topic: Georgia Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum Topic: Germantown Real Estate Forum Topic: Get Foreclosure Help - Stop Foreclosure Forum Topic: Gilbert Real Estate Forum Topic: Glendale Real Estate Forum Topic: Goals, Business Plans & Entities Topic: Grand Rapids Real Estate Forum Topic: Green Bay Topic: Greensboro Real Estate Forum Topic: Hammond Real Estate Forum Topic: Hartford Real Estate Forum Topic: Hawaii Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum Topic: Henderson Real Estate Forum Topic: Hialeah Real Estate Forum Topic: Hilo Real Estate Forum Topic: Home Owner Association (HOA) Issues & Problems Forum Topic: Honolulu Real Estate Forum Topic: Housing News & Real Estate Market Discussions Topic: Houston Real Estate Forum Topic: HUD, VA, and Tax Sales Topic: Huntington Real Estate Forum Topic: Huntsville Real Estate Forum Topic: Idaho Falls Real Estate Forum Topic: Idaho Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum Topic: Illinois Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum Topic: Indianapolis Real Estate Forum Topic: Indiana Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum Topic: Innovative Strategies Topic: Interest Rate Drops Topic: International Real Estate Topic: Investor Deal Diaries Topic: Investor Psychology Topic: Iowa Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum Topic: Jackson Real Estate Forum Topic: Jacksonville Real Estate Forum Topic: Jersey City Real Estate Forum Topic: Job Loss/Company Closings Topic: Joliet Real Estate Forum Topic: Jonesboro Real Estate Forum Topic: Kailua Real Estate Forum Topic: Kānèohe Real Estate Forum Topic: Kansas City Real Estate Forum Topic: Kansas City Real Estate Forum Topic: Kansas Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum Topic: Kentucky Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum Topic: Knoxville Real Estate Forum Topic: Lakewood Real Estate Forum Topic: Landlord Problem Solving Topic: Las Cruces Real Estate Forum Topic: Las Vegas Real Estate Forum Topic: Lewiston Real Estate Forum Topic: Lexington-Fayette Real Estate Forum Topic: Lincoln Real Estate Forum Topic: Little Rock Real Estate Forum Topic: Local Real Estate Networking Topic: Long Beach Real Estate Forum Topic: Long Island Real Estate Forum Topic: Los Angeles County Real Estate Forum Topic: Louisiana Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum Topic: Louisville Real Estate Forum Topic: Madison Real Estate Forum Topic: Maine Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum Topic: Managing Your Property Topic: Manchester Real Estate Forum Topic: Manitoba Topic: Marketing Your Rental Topic: Marketplace Topic: Maryland Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum Topic: Massachusetts Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum Topic: Meads Real Estate Forum Topic: Memphis Real Estate Forum Topic: Meridian Real Estate Forum Topic: Mesa Real Estate Forum Topic: Miami Topic: Michigan Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum Topic: Military Investing Topic: Milwaukee Real Estate Forum Topic: Minneapolis Real Estate Forum Topic: Minnesota Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum Topic: Mississippi Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum Topic: Missoula Real Estate Forum Topic: Missouri Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum Topic: Mobile (Alabama) Real Estate Forum Topic: Mobile Homes & Mobile Home Park Investing Topic: Modesto/Merced Real Estate Forum Topic: Montana Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum Topic: Montgomery Real Estate Forum Topic: Mortgage Payment Suspension Topic: Mt. Pleasant Real Estate Forum Topic: Multi-Family and Apartment Investing Forums Topic: Nampa Real Estate Forum Topic: Naperville Real Estate Forum Topic: Nashville Real Estate Forum Topic: Nebraska Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum Topic: Nevada Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum Topic: Newark Real Estate Forum Topic: New Brunswick Real Estate Forum Topic: Newfoundland and Labrador Real Estate Forum Topic: New Hampshire Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum Topic: New Haven Real Estate Forum Topic: New Jersey Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum Topic: New Member Introductions Topic: New Mexico Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum Topic: New Orleans Real Estate Forum Topic: New York City Real Estate Forum Topic: New York Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum Topic: Norfolk Real Estate Forum Topic: North Carolina Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum Topic: North Dakota Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum Topic: Northwest Territories Real Estate Forum Topic: Norwalk Real Estate Forum Topic: Nova Scotia Real Estate Forum Topic: Nunavut Real Estate Forum Topic: Oakland Real Estate Forum Topic: Off-Topic Topic: Ogden Topic: Ohio Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum Topic: Oklahoma City Real Estate Forum Topic: Oklahoma Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum Topic: Omaha Real Estate Forum Topic: Ontario Real Estate Forum Topic: Orange County Real Estate Forum Topic: Oregon Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum Topic: Orlando Real Estate Forum Topic: Overland Park Real Estate Forum Topic: Pearl City Real Estate Forum Topic: Pennsylvania Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum Topic: Peoria Real Estate Forum Topic: Personal Finance Forum Topic: Philadelphia Real Estate Forum Topic: Phoenix Real Estate Forum Topic: Pittsburgh Real Estate Forum Topic: Pocatello Real Estate Forum Topic: Portland Real Estate Forum Topic: Portland Real Estate Forum Topic: Prince Edward Island Real Estate Forum Topic: Private Lending & Conventional Mortgage Advice Topic: Property Insurance Questions & Discussions Topic: Providence Real Estate Forum Topic: Provo Real Estate Forum Topic: Quad Cities Real Estate Forum Topic: Quebec Real Estate Forum Topic: Questions About BiggerPockets and Official Site Announcements Topic: Raleigh Real Estate Forum Topic: Rapid City Real Estate Forum Topic: Real Estate Agent Forums Topic: Real Estate Crowdfunding Forums Topic: Real Estate Deal Analysis and Advice Topic: Real Estate Development & New Home Construction Topic: Real Estate Events and Happenings Topic: Real Estate Guru, Book & Course Reviews and Discussions Topic: Real Estate Investor Marketing Help & Advice Topic: Real Estate News & Current Events Topic: Real Estate Not-So-Successful Stories Topic: Real Estate Quizzes Topic: Real Estate Rookie Podcast Topic: Real Estate Success Stories Topic: Real Estate Technology, Social Media & Blogging Topic: Real Estate Wholesaling Questions & Answers Topic: Rehabbing and House Flipping Topic: Reno Real Estate Forum Topic: Renters Discussion Topic: Rent to Own a.k.a. Lease Purchase, Lease Options Topic: REOs Topic: Rhode Island Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum Topic: Richmond Real Estate Forum Topic: Rio Grande Valley Real Estate Forum Topic: Riverside Real Estate Forum Topic: Rochester Real Estate Forum Topic: Rockford Real Estate Forum Topic: Sacramento Real Estate Forum Topic: Saint Paul Real Estate Forum Topic: Salem Real Estate Forum Topic: Salt Lake City Real Estate Forum Topic: San Antonio Real Estate Forum Topic: San Diego Real Estate Forum Topic: Sandy Springs Real Estate Forum Topic: San Francisco Real Estate Forum Topic: San Jose Real Estate Forum Topic: San Luis Obispo Real Estate Forum Topic: Santa Fe Real Estate Forum Topic: Saskatchewan Real Estate Forum Topic: Savannah Real Estate Forum Topic: Scottsdale Real Estate Forum Topic: Seattle Real Estate Forum Topic: Short Sales Questions Topic: Short-Term and Vacation Rental Discussion Topic: Shreveport Real Estate Forum Topic: Sioux City Real Estate Forum Topic: Sioux Falls Real Estate Forum Topic: South Bend Real Estate Forum Topic: South Carolina Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum Topic: South Dakota Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum Topic: Southeast NC Real Estate Forum Topic: Spokane Real Estate Forum Topic: Springdale Real Estate Forum Topic: Springfield Real Estate Forum Topic: Stamford Real Estate Forum Topic: Starting Out Topic: St. Louis Real Estate Forum Topic: Stockton Real Estate Forum Topic: St. Petersburg Real Estate Forum Topic: STR Strategies Under Travel Restrictions Topic: Surprise Real Estate Forum Topic: Tacoma Real Estate Forum Topic: Tallahassee Real Estate Forum Topic: Tampa Real Estate Forum Topic: Tax, Legal Issues, Contracts, Self-Directed IRA Topic: Tax Liens, Notes, Paper, & Cash Flows Discussion Topic: Tempe Real Estate Forum Topic: Tenant Screening Topic: Tennessee Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum Topic: Texas Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum Topic: Thornton Real Estate Forum Topic: Toledo Real Estate Forum Topic: Topeka Real Estate Forum Topic: Tucson Real Estate Forum Topic: Tulsa Real Estate Forum Topic: Tuscaloosa Real Estate Forum Topic: Upstate New York Real Estate Forum Topic: Utah Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum Topic: Vancouver Real Estate Forum Topic: Vermont Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum Topic: Virginia Beach Real Estate Forum Topic: Virginia Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum Topic: Waipahu Real Estate Forum Topic: Waipahu Real Estate Forum Topic: Warren Real Estate Forum Topic: Warwick Real Estate Forum Topic: Washington D.C. Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum Topic: Washington Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum Topic: Waterbury Real Estate Forum Topic: Westchester County Real Estate Forum Topic: Western NC Real Estate Forum Topic: West Gulfport Real Estate Forum Topic: West Virginia Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum Topic: Wichita Real Estate Forum Topic: Wilkes Barre Scranton Real Estate Forum Topic: Wilmington Real Estate Forum Topic: Wisconsin Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum Topic: Worcester Real Estate Forum Topic: Wyoming Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum Topic: Yukon Real Estate Forum
Create post

Wisconsin - City Hid Condemned House Status Until After Purchase

21 Replies

  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on LinkedIn
Rotate Log in or sign up to reply
user profile avatar
  • Posts 19
  • Votes 13

Vincent John Tucci
Attorney from Irvine, CA

posted over 1 year ago

Posting for a friend of mine who would like to remain nameless.  Thank you in advance for anyone that can shed some light for him.  He is a biggerpockets follower so he will see your posts.  


....."Purchased House from County in Tax Delinquent Sealed Auction in Wisconsin, “As Is”. Prior to purchase we obtained a title and judgement search, all results showed no liens, judgements, or anything else. Once we entered we saw the home needed more work and money than we could do at that time so we focused on other projects. A year later we returned to the house for construction bids and for potential sale when we received a “Raze Order” requiring us to demolish within 30 days or the City will do it at our expense. Our realtor called/emailed the city and the city admitted that the house should have been demolished years ago but they never got around to it. City said they tried to contact the previous owner in 2017 (before we purchased) but they had “issues” notifying the bank and because of that they did not record any raze order. In the emails they use the word condemned. There has never been any posting on the house that the property was condemned (nor is there a posting now about the raze order). They also told me on the phone the property was condemned for health reasons.

I believe we get 30 days from notice for to file restraining order/injunction and I believe they have not followed many procedures of raze or condemnation, but I’m not sure of the relevance, it may only delay the inevitable. State law says that if it costs more than 50% to repair the house then it is subject to raze order. I was on the verge of a sale when we got the raze order as I was just looking to make the money back I spent on it. I can’t spend another 10-15k on an attorney only to wind up in the same place in a year. The fight is not whether it costs more than 50% to repair, that is fight I believe we will lose. The thing I’m having trouble with is the government owning and having access to the house, making a determination that the house needs to be demolished, yet not file any paper or put up any postings or anything until after it is sold at government auction. They have sinced filed the raze order, further destroying my chances of a sale even if I were to get the raze order removed. Again, just looking to make my money back and not lose my shirt. Thank you for any assistance."

Rotate Log in or sign up to reply
user profile avatar
  • Posts 6.0K
  • Votes 9.4K

Dennis M.
Rental Property Investor from Erie, pa

replied over 1 year ago

geez that’s a tough spot to be in . I believe I’d look at filing suit against the city for fraudulence and withholding that information which should have been publicly recorded or understand on the title . This could certainly get ugly and expensive depending how far it’s taken .

Rotate Log in or sign up to reply
user profile avatar
Check Rosette Top Subjects:
Team, Traditional Financing, and Single Family
  • Posts 33K
  • Votes 46K

Jay Hinrichs
Real Estate Broker from Lake Oswego OR Summerlin, NV

replied over 1 year ago

did you buy the title insurance that the key question if you did and did not skimp out on that one you would have a claim

Rotate Log in or sign up to reply
user profile avatar
  • Posts 918
  • Votes 572

Scott Schultz
Rental Property Investor from West Bend, WI

replied over 1 year ago

did you get a special assessment letter and check with building inspections for open orders from the city prior to closing?  and what @Jay Hinrichs said about title insurance. I have never known a municipality to push through a raise order if you have a plan for renovation, but the sale may complicate things.

Rotate Log in or sign up to reply
user profile avatar
  • Posts 213
  • Votes 128

Chad Nagel
Rental Property Investor from Fond Du Lac, WI

replied over 1 year ago

Many municipalities have the 50% raise order. I have not personally seen it enforced. Nor did I know it was a state law. Municipalities tend to do what they want in many instances, I've had them mail previous owner in regards to violations and stick me with $600 with out any notice. I no longer invest in those cities that do things of that nature. 

Rotate Log in or sign up to reply
user profile avatar
Check Rosette Top Subjects:
Rentals, Team, and Traditional Financing
  • Posts 2.2K
  • Votes 2.5K

Marcus Auerbach
Real Estate Agent from Milwaukee - Mequon, WI

replied over 1 year ago

Sorry to hear, you are in a tough spot. Even tough it seems the city may be at fault here and have not followed protocoll, you are probably facing an uphill battle. Assuming that the house does not have the best curb appeal, I don't think the goal of the city is to necessarily raze the house, but to find a solution to the eyesore problem. I am sure the neighbors are not happy to have a delapitated property right next to them and quite frankly this is where communities have to step up for everyone's benefit. The fact that you did let it sit for a year without doing anything is probably not beeing looked at favorably by the neighbors either and I'd say understandbly. I guess my focus would be on renovations; if it's gone too far, then raze it and sell the lot. Because selling it to someone else is just kicking the can down the road. Maybe the city would assist in some way? I do believe that as investors we have a role to play in society (that's why the IRS gives us so many incentives to do what we do) and we have a social responsibility as landlords, flippers, developers etc beyond making money and that's sometimes just not fun.

Rotate Log in or sign up to reply
user profile avatar
  • Posts 19
  • Votes 13

Vincent John Tucci
Attorney from Irvine, CA

replied over 1 year ago

Thank you to everyone who has responded.  I am sure my friend is reviewing all the posts so thank you. I feel terribly for the guy because it has put a sour taste in his mouth about investing in real estate.

Rotate Log in or sign up to reply
user profile avatar
Check Rosette Top Subject:
Team
  • Posts 193
  • Votes 64

Ryan Seib
Attorney and Real Estate Broker from Madison, WI

replied over 1 year ago

City has to pay him for fair market value for condemnation doesn't it? Eminent domain and all. The key would be having him talk to an attorney probably in Milwaukee who is familiar with eminent domain.

Rotate Log in or sign up to reply
user profile avatar
Check Rosette Top Subjects:
Rentals, Real Estate Finance, and Maintenance
  • Posts 13K
  • Votes 22K

Russell Brazil (Moderator) -
Real Estate Agent from Washington, D.C.

replied over 1 year ago
Originally posted by @Ryan Seib :

City has to pay him for fair market value for condemnation doesn't it? Eminent domain and all. The key would be having him talk to an attorney probably in Milwaukee who is familiar with eminent domain.

 No, this is not an eminent domain issue. The city isnt taking the property from the owner, they are ordering it condemned.

Rotate Log in or sign up to reply
user profile avatar
  • Posts 117
  • Votes 74

Ryan McKimm
Developer from Las Vegas, NV

replied over 1 year ago

I'd just go in with the buyer and tell the city you are in the process of fixing it up, which is what the city wants to hear. That should buy you time to it get fixed up. I don't think they really want to go through the process of using city funds to tear it down. No need for an attorney for a fight you won't win. They just want to remedy a problem house.

Rotate Log in or sign up to reply
user profile avatar
  • Posts 19
  • Votes 13

Vincent John Tucci
Attorney from Irvine, CA

replied over 1 year ago

Response from my friend ...

Thank you for the response thus far, to answer some of the questions presented:

1) We did not buy title insurance. I do not recall if we were able to because of the type of deed we acquired or if was newbie ignorance, or both. I had a different title company do a search to determine if the first company missed something, but they both had no record of anything. For whatever it's worth, the person at the title company told me that because of the nature and timing of what occurred that even title insurance would not have protected us. I don't know if that's true, but it what they told me.

2) The only notices from the city were for snow removal and cut grass which we remedied. There were no other notices whatsoever. We did not check for open orders from the city prior to closing, but we called the city when we took over and they made it just seem like it was a routine house in need of repair. They even made us pay for turning on the water despite no one living at the property.

3) The house sat vacant apparently for years and we did some preventative maintenance and also addressed the grass, snow, and other issues affecting the neighborhood. There was activity at the property and we were actively selling it to another investor. I understand the social responsibility aspect, we have already turned a vacant property into a home and a new tax source for the city in the past couple months, but this came out of nowhere. No posting on the home after condemning it? Allowing it to go to sale without any notification? It's been in bad shape for years, but suddenly it needs to be removed within 30 days? It's one thing if it was in bad shape but repairable and we let it go to the point of condemnation, but that's not the case. We had interested buyers willing to take on the project, which would mean more money for the city rather than a vacant lot that won't be built on for years if this goes through.

I've seen instances where the city works with people like us and acts reasonable. Gives deadlines, benchmarks with timelines, modifications, ect. There has been nothing here (so far) and there was no way for any buyer to see the true condition of the home without breaking in and trespassing prior to the sealed auction (which I know many investors do). Not sure how our new found family business can sustain such losses.

Rotate Log in or sign up to reply
user profile avatar
Check Rosette Top Subjects:
Rentals, Team, and Traditional Financing
  • Posts 2.2K
  • Votes 2.5K

Marcus Auerbach
Real Estate Agent from Milwaukee - Mequon, WI

replied over 1 year ago

@Vincent John Tucci - I can see how it happens. I feel bad for your friend. Buying at auction, site unseen is the riskiest of all acquisition methods. If you buy 10 auction properties a year you can assume that one or two are turds, but they average out with the volume. And if you have the people and rehab skill set you can deal with the bad ones too. But it seems like a good idea; after all that's what they do on HGTV, right? The price was probably tempting...

I hate to say this (because that is NOT how good work is done), but most properties can be fixed up surprisingly well with "paint and duct tape". I would do what's necessary and then get it sold.

Rotate Log in or sign up to reply
user profile avatar
Check Rosette Top Subject:
Team
  • Posts 193
  • Votes 64

Ryan Seib
Attorney and Real Estate Broker from Madison, WI

replied over 1 year ago
Originally posted by @Russell Brazil :
Originally posted by @Ryan Seib:

City has to pay him for fair market value for condemnation doesn't it? Eminent domain and all. The key would be having him talk to an attorney probably in Milwaukee who is familiar with eminent domain.

 No, this is not an eminent domain issue. The city isnt taking the property from the owner, they are ordering it condemned.

Hi Mr. Brazil thanks for the response but I am afraid you are misinformed. Condemnation is the name used for the exercise of eminent domain power. So it is an eminent domain issue. What would you think happens to condemned property if the "city isnt taking the property..."? I think rather obviously when you think about it, the end result of a condemnation is that the city takes possession of the property when its conditions are not met.

Rather, my point was that (since this is a use of eminent domain power), what is the "fair market value" the city is going to come up with to pay him to take his property for public use (ie remedy "blight" or whatever). So, while I thought he ought to talk to an eminent domain attorney to check the specifics of procedure he alleges were not followed, etc., possibly even more importantly I am guessing he would want to get out ahead of the valuation side, and at least try to get the city to pay him FMV. I have known investors get quite a bit of value out of municipalities that want to take property for whatever reason. Often the municipality has an ulterior motive such as wishing to sell the property to a developer or build a telephone line on the lot or something. So, if the investor happens to have some leverage and savvy they can demand a much higher price!

 

Rotate Log in or sign up to reply
user profile avatar
Check Rosette Top Subject:
Team
  • Posts 193
  • Votes 64

Ryan Seib
Attorney and Real Estate Broker from Madison, WI

replied over 1 year ago

Here is a link he may find helpful: http://www.ownerscounsel.com/h...

Rotate Log in or sign up to reply
user profile avatar
Check Rosette Top Subjects:
Team, Traditional Financing, and Single Family
  • Posts 33K
  • Votes 46K

Jay Hinrichs
Real Estate Broker from Lake Oswego OR Summerlin, NV

replied over 1 year ago
Originally posted by @Ryan Seib :
Originally posted by @Russell Brazil:
Originally posted by @Ryan Seib:

City has to pay him for fair market value for condemnation doesn't it? Eminent domain and all. The key would be having him talk to an attorney probably in Milwaukee who is familiar with eminent domain.

 No, this is not an eminent domain issue. The city isnt taking the property from the owner, they are ordering it condemned.

Hi Mr. Brazil thanks for the response but I am afraid you are misinformed. Condemnation is the name used for the exercise of eminent domain power. So it is an eminent domain issue. What would you think happens to condemned property if the "city isnt taking the property..."? I think rather obviously when you think about it, the end result of a condemnation is that the city takes possession of the property when its conditions are not met.

Rather, my point was that (since this is a use of eminent domain power), what is the "fair market value" the city is going to come up with to pay him to take his property for public use (ie remedy "blight" or whatever). So, while I thought he ought to talk to an eminent domain attorney to check the specifics of procedure he alleges were not followed, etc., possibly even more importantly I am guessing he would want to get out ahead of the valuation side, and at least try to get the city to pay him FMV. I have known investors get quite a bit of value out of municipalities that want to take property for whatever reason. Often the municipality has an ulterior motive such as wishing to sell the property to a developer or build a telephone line on the lot or something. So, if the investor happens to have some leverage and savvy they can demand a much higher price!

I don't agree with your argument …   having had many a house razed by the city and then get a bill for it.. just had one done in Indy. but that's because we did not get to it in time to rehab  we were going to demo it anyway.  

I have another one where the title co missed the order to raze and we have filed a title claim. And expect to get paid out.. had the title commitment had the order as an exception we would not have purchased.. they missed it. 

 

Rotate Log in or sign up to reply
user profile avatar
  • Posts 21K
  • Votes 12K

Wayne Brooks
Real Estate Professional from West Palm Beach, Florida

replied over 1 year ago

@Ryan Seib I have to agree with @Russell Brazil and @Jay Hinrichs ...I see no correlation between an order of condemnation and eminent domain....the city is Not seeking to take title. The condemnation determination is simply a required procedural step to be able to proceed with demolition, at the owner’s expense, where a property has been neglected, violating health and safety codes. 

The city is Not seeking to acquire for public use. 

Rotate Log in or sign up to reply
user profile avatar
  • Posts 21K
  • Votes 12K

Wayne Brooks
Real Estate Professional from West Palm Beach, Florida

replied over 1 year ago

@Vincent John Tucci The condemnation order doesn’t really change anything.....the same amount of work has to be done to restore the property. You simply need to contact the city....they halt demolition orders all the time when the owner shows them a plan and intent to restore the property. 

Rotate Log in or sign up to reply
user profile avatar
  • Posts 19
  • Votes 13

Vincent John Tucci
Attorney from Irvine, CA

replied over 1 year ago

Thank you everyone who has responded.  I have forwarded all links and messages.  Again, thank you.

Rotate Log in or sign up to reply
user profile avatar
Check Rosette Top Subject:
Team
  • Posts 193
  • Votes 64

Ryan Seib
Attorney and Real Estate Broker from Madison, WI

replied over 1 year ago

@Russell Brazil , @Jay Hinrichs , and @Wayne Brooks

I appreciate the push back on this from you guys! It really is helpful to do so in order to further everyone's knowledge I think.

So whether the city wants to take title or not as a result of the raze order I do not think was clear. Either way, the procedure is likely called "condemnation". If the city was taking title it would also probably "condemn" the property in order to do so.

Now the legal theory which underlays what we call in common parlance "condemnation" is called "eminent domain". If there were no eminent domain power, the city could not condemn any private property. Eminent domain just means, the right of the government to take private property. Whether the government actually takes title to the property is not relevant, since eminent domain includes "regulatory takings" and "partial takings" (ie diminution in value of private property as a result of government actions). This is a very fertile topic to which many legal scholars have devoted their entire lives. By the way I am not saying anyone should be devoting their lives to such things, but merely that this is the case.

If I am wrong that is news to me and apparently to the Wisconsin Supreme court as well. In a random opinion I just pulled up to find some language for you all, is this majority opinion of the court authored by Justice Patience Roggensack in 2007:

In Arrowhead Farms, Inc. v. Dodge County, 21 Wis.2d 647, 124 N.W.2d 631 (1963), we ... grounded the requirement of good faith negotiation in a primary purpose of statutory condemnation: to provide just compensation to the property owner. Id. at 651, 124 N.W.2d 631.

¶ 7 In Herro v. Natural Resources Board, 53 Wis.2d 157, 192 N.W.2d 104 (1971), we ... explained the nexus between good faith negotiation prior to issuing a jurisdictional offer and the ability to exercise the power of eminent domain:

[U]nless there is a bona fide attempt on the part of the condemnor to induce the owner to sell the land at a reasonable figure, the condition under which the power is granted is not fulfilled, and in such case any attempted exercise of eminent domain is unauthorized and consequently void and of no effect. . . .

Id. quoting 6 Nichols, Eminent Domain § 24.62(1) at 85 (3d ed.).

¶ 8 In examining the negotiation efforts made in Herro, we reiterated that ch. 32 provides the exclusive procedure in condemnation actions, including the requirement to negotiate before making a jurisdictional offer to purchase. Herro, 53 Wis.2d at 171, 192 N.W.2d 104. We explained that we strictly construe the portions of ch. 32 that apply to condemnation by requiring that the condemnor complete all of the statutory steps because condemnation is in derogation of the common law. Id. (citing City of Madison v. Tiedeman, 1 Wis.2d 136, 83 N.W.2d 694 (1957) and Schroedel Corp. v. State Highway Comm'n, 34 Wis.2d 32, 148 N.W.2d 691 (1967)). Warehouse II, LLC v. State Dept. of Transp., 715 N.W.2d 213, 2006 WI 62 (Wis., 2006).

Warehouse II, LLC v. State Dept. of Transp., 715 N.W.2d 213, 2006 WI 62 (Wis., 2006)

What this means essentially as applied to this matter, is that the city's use of the power of eminent domain (through a process it calls condemnation), to attempt to partially take this BPer's private property (by reducing its value through a raze order, whether followed or not by title transfer to the city), for public use (in this case the public use at issue is that the city apparently thinks the public health/property values would be improved by razing the property) is subject to court and procedural review and to "just compensation" to the owner. I do not know all the ins and outs of the last part of that statement, including what court or procedural review process he could follow to fight the condemnation, which is why I recommended he talk to an eminent domain attorney. But it is clear that the city is using its powers of eminent domain to condemn private property here. That means he has rights to defend himself as stated by the fifth amendment to the US Constitution, Article I Section 13 of the Wisconsin Constitution, and generations of caselaw to back up partial takings/regulatory takings adjudication.

Feel free to push back more if I am wrong perhaps I am! I would be very interested to learn what other basis government has for taking or reducing value of private property. Eminent domain is the justification for innumerable government regulations and takings against private property owners so this is actually a very important topic.

Rotate Log in or sign up to reply
user profile avatar
Check Rosette Top Subjects:
Team, Traditional Financing, and Single Family
  • Posts 33K
  • Votes 46K

Jay Hinrichs
Real Estate Broker from Lake Oswego OR Summerlin, NV

replied over 1 year ago
Originally posted by @Ryan Seib :

@Russell Brazil , @Jay Hinrichs, and @Wayne Brooks

I appreciate the push back on this from you guys! It really is helpful to do so in order to further everyone's knowledge I think.

So whether the city wants to take title or not as a result of the raze order I do not think was clear. Either way, the procedure is likely called "condemnation". If the city was taking title it would also probably "condemn" the property in order to do so.

Now the legal theory which underlays what we call in common parlance "condemnation" is called "eminent domain". If there were no eminent domain power, the city could not condemn any private property. Eminent domain just means, the right of the government to take private property. Whether the government actually takes title to the property is not relevant, since eminent domain includes "regulatory takings" and "partial takings" (ie diminution in value of private property as a result of government actions). This is a very fertile topic to which many legal scholars have devoted their entire lives. By the way I am not saying anyone should be devoting their lives to such things, but merely that this is the case.

If I am wrong that is news to me and apparently to the Wisconsin Supreme court as well. In a random opinion I just pulled up to find some language for you all, is this majority opinion of the court authored by Justice Patience Roggensack in 2007:

In Arrowhead Farms, Inc. v. Dodge County, 21 Wis.2d 647, 124 N.W.2d 631 (1963), we ... grounded the requirement of good faith negotiation in a primary purpose of statutory condemnation: to provide just compensation to the property owner. Id. at 651, 124 N.W.2d 631.

¶ 7 In Herro v. Natural Resources Board, 53 Wis.2d 157, 192 N.W.2d 104 (1971), we ... explained the nexus between good faith negotiation prior to issuing a jurisdictional offer and the ability to exercise the power of eminent domain:

[U]nless there is a bona fide attempt on the part of the condemnor to induce the owner to sell the land at a reasonable figure, the condition under which the power is granted is not fulfilled, and in such case any attempted exercise of eminent domain is unauthorized and consequently void and of no effect. . . .

Id. quoting 6 Nichols, Eminent Domain § 24.62(1) at 85 (3d ed.).

¶ 8 In examining the negotiation efforts made in Herro, we reiterated that ch. 32 provides the exclusive procedure in condemnation actions, including the requirement to negotiate before making a jurisdictional offer to purchase. Herro, 53 Wis.2d at 171, 192 N.W.2d 104. We explained that we strictly construe the portions of ch. 32 that apply to condemnation by requiring that the condemnor complete all of the statutory steps because condemnation is in derogation of the common law. Id. (citing City of Madison v. Tiedeman, 1 Wis.2d 136, 83 N.W.2d 694 (1957) and Schroedel Corp. v. State Highway Comm'n, 34 Wis.2d 32, 148 N.W.2d 691 (1967)). Warehouse II, LLC v. State Dept. of Transp., 715 N.W.2d 213, 2006 WI 62 (Wis., 2006).

Warehouse II, LLC v. State Dept. of Transp., 715 N.W.2d 213, 2006 WI 62 (Wis., 2006)

What this means essentially as applied to this matter, is that the city's use of the power of eminent domain (through a process it calls condemnation), to attempt to partially take this BPer's private property (by reducing its value through a raze order, whether followed or not by title transfer to the city), for public use (in this case the public use at issue is that the city apparently thinks the public health/property values would be improved by razing the property) is subject to court and procedural review and to "just compensation" to the owner. I do not know all the ins and outs of the last part of that statement, including what court or procedural review process he could follow to fight the condemnation, which is why I recommended he talk to an eminent domain attorney. But it is clear that the city is using its powers of eminent domain to condemn private property here. That means he has rights to defend himself as stated by the fifth amendment to the US Constitution, Article I Section 13 of the Wisconsin Constitution, and generations of caselaw to back up partial takings/regulatory takings adjudication.

Feel free to push back more if I am wrong perhaps I am! I would be very interested to learn what other basis government has for taking or reducing value of private property. Eminent domain is the justification for innumerable government regulations and takings against private property owners so this is actually a very important topic. 

I suspect this would cost more to litigate to prove the point than the property Is worth

cities condemn buildings all the time and not only do they not pay you they lien the real property for the costs :) 

 

Rotate Log in or sign up to reply
user profile avatar
Check Rosette Top Subjects:
Rentals, Real Estate Finance, and Maintenance
  • Posts 13K
  • Votes 22K

Russell Brazil (Moderator) -
Real Estate Agent from Washington, D.C.

replied over 1 year ago

Many words in the english language have multiple meanings, condemn has at least 3 meanings 2 of which here are being confused. A municipality can condemn a building, order the destruction of the physical structure which is not the same as condemnation, the seizing of the land and its structures via eminent domain, and is not the same aw condemning, or expressing disapproval of the building. It seems mostly apparent from the ops description that the use of the word condemn here is in reference to building code violations being enforced in an order to destroy the physical structure on the land, and not seize the land through the use of eminent domain, nor to express disapproval.

And when a municipality condemns your physical building, you don't get compensation like you would via eminent domain condemnation, but rather you get a big fat bill for the cost of demoliting the property. Thats happened here to Jay and probably many other people here on BP.  The ability to enforce housing codes and such eminates from the states police powers, not from its eminent domain powers.

Rotate Log in or sign up to reply
user profile avatar
Check Rosette Top Subject:
Team
  • Posts 193
  • Votes 64

Ryan Seib
Attorney and Real Estate Broker from Madison, WI

replied over 1 year ago

@Jay Hinrichs agreed litigation will almost always cost too much. Litigating anything is almost 100% of the time a terrible idea. You do not have to litigate to negotiate with a municipality though. Municipalities are made up of just a bunch of people trying to keep their jobs like anywhere else, and they will negotiate if they get a benefit from it.

@Russell Brazil Okay you are right. I guess I missed the part about code violations. I had thought the property was worth something and as it was just sold and the investor was fixing it etc. Maybe it is?

The city's argument will always be there is a health code violation no matter what it does that looks like a taking. A landlord here in Madison was hit with a raze order once for rat infestations, etc I think. A couple of days before they had scheduled to destroy it he sent a crew over and fixed it so they left him alone. I assume if they had destroyed a perfectly functional property he would have been able to show it was a taking not a health code violation they were engaged in and entitled to compensation. As the federal court in Wisconsin wrote about raze orders enforcement, "Such measures are not designed to appropriate property for public use at private expense ... but rather are designed to prevent the injury and disease which are so often the by products of substandard housing." Devines v Maier, 494 F Supp992 ED Wis 1980.

Updated over 1 year ago

I just read a case about takings law changes at the supreme court and it prompted me to think about this issue a little more. Basically, I think condemnation is a use of police power to the extent it is not a taking under the fifth amendment. But that of course begs the question by assuming the issue. What I had recommended to OP was to talk to a lawyer who can help him/her classify whether this was a non-taking use of police power. Even if the state followed its own regulations making it just a zoning process that would in some sense be an exception from the takings clause of the US Constitution, the process itself, or substantive steps within it may constitute a regulatory taking or give rise to an inverse condemnation claim. Sometimes just analysing the fairness of what the municipality asserts and telling them you disagree based on federal constitutional analysis can get them to think twice about saying my way or the highway. At the least they might give OP more time to deal with the house, fix it, or whatever. Anyways I am not an expert just trying to help and I think property owners benefit by being informed and unafraid of asserting their rights where it is cost effective and efficient as a business to do so.

Rotate Log in or sign up to reply
  • 1
Related Resources General Landlording & Rental Properties
Have Top-Notch Tenants? Here’s How to Keep Them
5 Essential Property Maintenance Tasks To Keep Your Rental in Tip-Top Shape
Rental Arbitrage: The Secret to Making a Fortune on Airbnb Without Owning Property
8 Reasons the Best Landlords Always E-Sign Rental Agreements
6 Tips for Listing Your Rental Property Online
Resources Read, see, and learn more!
Link Real Estate Investment Calculators
Link BiggerPockets Blog
Link Path to Purchase
Link Mortgage Loans
Link Find a Contractor
Link Real Estate Agents
Link Hard Money Lenders
Link Real Estate Listings

Top Contributors

Nathan G.
Nathan G.
Cody, WY
9.76
Score
Supada L.
Supada L.
7.32
Score
Bjorn Ahlblad
Bjorn Ahlblad
Shelton, WA
5.62
Score
Joe Villeneuve
Joe Villeneuve
Plymouth, MI
5.48
Score
Joe Splitrock
Joe Splitrock
Sioux Falls, SD
5.32
Score

General Landlording & Rental Properties Trending Discussions

  • Do i go basic or decent on appliances on new rental?
    14 Replies
  • HOA Assessments - any experience?
    13 Replies
  • Collect Move-in Fee, No Sec Deposit Correct?
    7 Replies
  • How much does it cost to put up a new Bathroom in the basement?
    7 Replies
  • New property owner with complicated eviction
    8 Replies
Log in Sign up

Log in

Forgot password?

If you signed up for BiggerPockets via Facebook, you can log in with just one click!

Log in with Facebook

Or
btn_google_dark_normal_ios Created with Sketch. Continue with Google

Let's get started

We just need a few details to get you set up and ready to go!

Use your real name

Use at least 8 characters. Using a phrase of random words (like: paper Dog team blue) is secure and easy to remember.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.

Or
btn_google_dark_normal_ios Created with Sketch. Continue with Google

Why create an account?

Receive a free digital download of The Ultimate Beginner's Guide to Real Estate Investing.

Connect with 1,000,000+ real estate investors!

Find local real estate meetups and events in your area.

Start analyzing real estate properties, we do the math for you.

It's free!

Explore

  • Membership
  • Community
  • Education
  • Marketplace
  • Tools
  • FilePlace
  • REI Resources
  • Perks
  • Glossary
  • Reviews
  • iOS App
  • Android App

Company

  • About Us
  • Press
  • Advertising
  • Careers
  • Stats
  • Contact Us

Important

  • Editorial Guidelines
  • Terms of Use
  • Rules
  • Privacy
  • FAQ

Social

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
© 2004-2021 BiggerPockets, LLC. All Rights Reserved.