Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 6 years ago on . Most recent reply

Account Closed
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Las Vegas, NV
1,348
Votes |
2,334
Posts

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

215
Posts
378
Votes
Jeff Willis
  • CA & NV
378
Votes |
215
Posts
Jeff Willis
  • CA & NV
Replied

California has SB 50 which does exactly the same thing.  Calif, like Minneapolis, cloaks the real purpose under terms like "affordable housing, inclusive neighborhoods, transit-friendly, etc." but it is for the sole purpose of increasing political power and tax revenue.

Housing costs X dollars per S/F and that will not change, and it is not affordable by the standards needed to create self-sustaining low-income housing. Until the states and local Governments provider tax property breaks, there will not be low income housing, but that would go against their plan.

Loading replies...