Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 12 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

184
Posts
55
Votes
Kevin Dickson
  • SFR Investor
  • Denver, CO
55
Votes |
184
Posts

When Zoning Law is Just Wrong

Kevin Dickson
  • SFR Investor
  • Denver, CO
Posted

Many cities have implemented a law that states "a maximum of three unrelated adults may occupy a dwelling unit".

That means you can't legally rent a huge 5 bedroom, 3 bath house to four students or, say, two gay couples. Yet this same house can legally have up to twelve related adults with thirteen cars.

Has anyone here ever bumped up against this issue?

A PM in Milwaukee has explained it more thoroughly at landlordpedia.com:
http://www.landlordpedia.com/index.php?title=Municipal_Ordinance_restricting_number_of_unrelated_adults

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

184
Posts
55
Votes
Kevin Dickson
  • SFR Investor
  • Denver, CO
55
Votes |
184
Posts
Kevin Dickson
  • SFR Investor
  • Denver, CO
Replied

Guys, thanks for your responses.

Eric Blackford, yes, a group of roommates can be a real hassle. But if you own a 4 bedroom home near a university, it's the reality of your market.

But I think a law like this is a civil rights violation imposed by annoyed neighbors. Quoting from the landlordwiki:

"the city will ultimately lose a case on the fair housing aspect of this as the federal courts have repeatedly said family status based occupancy ordinances are illegal. The only ordinances that are valid are square footage based."

Loading replies...