Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

7
Posts
3
Votes
Nick Wilkinson
3
Votes |
7
Posts

Buying duplex at 100% LTV! Over-Leveraging or Good Deal?

Nick Wilkinson
Posted

Hello all,


I am currently the owner of 2 duplexes, 1 conversion and 1 side-by-side. The conversion was purchased using a down payment of 20% and cash flows $525/m. The side-by-side was purchased 100% LTV (zero percent down) and cash flows about $400/m. Obviously, this means my cash-on-cash return is infinity but I started with zero equity in the property and have to build it over the long term. The bank was willing to loan me 100% of the property value because my dad has built a very good relationship with them over the last 20 years through his construction business. I recently spoke to the loan officer and he said he would be willing to do this again.

Should I keep taking advantage of the 100% LTV and low-interest rates or is this "over-leveraging" too risky? Any advice would be appreciated.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,829
Posts
1,242
Votes
Brian G.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
1,242
Votes |
1,829
Posts
Brian G.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
Replied

@Nick Wilkinson it's not the LTV that poses the greatest risk in RE, it is a lack of liquidity. By example, if I owned 5 properties at 100%LTV worth $1M but had $1M cash in the bank then my risk is extremely low. This example is an exaggeration to make a point: being well capitalized is more important than your %LTV.

Loading replies...