Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 3 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

1
Posts
0
Votes
Melissa M.
0
Votes |
1
Posts

Los Angeles - Assigning LAND vs BUILDING VALUE for depreciation

Melissa M.
Posted

Hi everyone! First of all, just want to say I'm really grateful for this community. 

I bought my first property this year - a SFH in front (where I owner-occupy for now but plan to rent out in 1-2 years) and two ADUs in the back (which I rent out). I was hoping assigning land value for depreciation would be simple as using the county's assessment; but the property tax assessment I received was not what I was expecting at all.

Land value: 620K
Improvements: 120K
Total: 800K

To be honest, when I was running my numbers, I estimated not being able to depreciate 50% land value; and I thought I was being conservative. I could not have imagined almost 80% would be assigned to land value. That's a huge amount that's un-depreciable!

So BP community, what are my options here? What have other landlords done in this situation? I've looked into appealing tax assessment. I've looked at using other valuation methods; however the IRS seems to favor using property tax assessment.


Would appreciate any insight! Thank you. 

Loading replies...